2003
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2003.1261136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial adaptive subspace detection in OTH radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The information of island echo can be seen in different distance cells because of its big size. The detection of target with low velocity is disturbed by island and land echo [13,14]. Zero frequency interference is the disturbance locating in the zero frequency among Doppler frequency spectrum nearby.…”
Section: Time-varying Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information of island echo can be seen in different distance cells because of its big size. The detection of target with low velocity is disturbed by island and land echo [13,14]. Zero frequency interference is the disturbance locating in the zero frequency among Doppler frequency spectrum nearby.…”
Section: Time-varying Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant fraction of the work in adaptive processing for HFSWR is apparently led by Dr. Yuri Abramovich and Dr. Giuseppe Fabrizio at Defense Science and Technology Organization (DSTO) in Australia [3,[26][27][28][29][30]. In particular, Fabrizio has several contributions developed in detail in his thesis and then several later works that are reviewed…”
Section: Literature Review Of Hfswr Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the adaptive matched filter (AMF) [3], which solves (1) following a two-step approach, is a prominent example of robust detector, while the adaptive coherence estimator (ACE, also known as adaptive normalized matched filter) [4], [5], [6] and Kelly's detector are selective receivers, i.e., they have excellent rejection capabilities of signals arriving from directions different from the nominal one [7]. Other detectors try to explicitly take into account rejection capabilities at the design stage, namely based on the adaptive beamformer orthogonal rejection test (ABORT) [8] or related ideas [9], [10], subspace detection [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], and cone-shaped constraints [16], [17], [18]. In the ABORT approach the idea is to modify the null hypothesis, by introducting (in addition to the noise term) a fictitious signal which is somehow orthogonal to the assumed target's signature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%