2020
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1807309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Aggregation Entropy: A Heterogeneity and Uncertainty Metric of Spatial Aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation corresponds to the well-known Modifiable Area Unit Problem (MAUP), referred to in studies on the geography of crime [90,91]. Although there is a large body of literature on this problem, there is no general solution to it [92]. A sensitivity analysis is recommended for future studies, which was not possible in this study due to the lack of data at finer spatial scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation corresponds to the well-known Modifiable Area Unit Problem (MAUP), referred to in studies on the geography of crime [90,91]. Although there is a large body of literature on this problem, there is no general solution to it [92]. A sensitivity analysis is recommended for future studies, which was not possible in this study due to the lack of data at finer spatial scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that even in the absence of spatial autocorrelation, the correlation coefficient increases by grouping and aggregation. Attempts have been made to provide solutions for the MAUP problem based on the size and interconnectedness of the areas [66] and spatial entropy [67,68].…”
Section: Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning has traditionally been associated with a reductionist perspective of cause and effect (Byrne, 2003; Chettiparamb, 2014) – a perspective that essentially delimits itself to an understanding of mechanical complicatedness, more so than social complexity. However, aggregating and simplifying data across spatial scales causes issues with oversimplification and loss of statistical generalizability (Dapena et al, 2016; Garreton and Sánchez, 2016; Jelinski and Wu, 1996; Kar and Hodgson, 2012; Stillwell et al, 2018; Xiao, 2021). This discrepancy is the entry point to the research question of this paper, which concerns a basic premise of planning: i.e., how abstract can a political decision-making model be without compromising its generalizability?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%