1987
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(87)90023-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and/or temporal adjustments of scanning behavior to visibility changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their theoretical proposal marks a renaissance of ideas close to the classic notion of perceptual span control, which, although very appealing, has unfortunately been shown to be not in harmony with a substantial body of empirical evidence. First, there are studies that manipulated visual parameters, such as viewing distance (O'Regan, Lévy-Schoen & Jacobs, 1983), target-background similarity and letter visibility (Jacobs 1986, Jacobs & O'Regan 1987 using psychophysical methods. In these studies the concomitant changes in saccade extent or fixation duration to be expected from perceptual span control were not observed.…”
Section: Whither Models Of Eye Movement Control In Reading?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their theoretical proposal marks a renaissance of ideas close to the classic notion of perceptual span control, which, although very appealing, has unfortunately been shown to be not in harmony with a substantial body of empirical evidence. First, there are studies that manipulated visual parameters, such as viewing distance (O'Regan, Lévy-Schoen & Jacobs, 1983), target-background similarity and letter visibility (Jacobs 1986, Jacobs & O'Regan 1987 using psychophysical methods. In these studies the concomitant changes in saccade extent or fixation duration to be expected from perceptual span control were not observed.…”
Section: Whither Models Of Eye Movement Control In Reading?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oculomotor apparatus is thus capable of producing saccades of a wide range of amplitudes depending on the context (Yarbus, 1967; Bahill et al, 1975; Leigh and Zee, 1999; Pelz and Canosa, 2001; Borji and Itti, 2014). Furthermore, a number of studies indicate that the size of saccades is closely linked to visual and cognitive processing (Jacobs and O’Regan, 1987; Land et al, 1999; Tatler et al, 2006). Indeed, while small (<10° of visual angle) saccades are more frequent, their proportion, relative to large saccades varies with the task, indicating a functional distinction between the two types of saccades (Tatler et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have proposed that visual exploration with large saccades corresponds to a pre-attentive or “ambient” scanning mode, while small saccades would be associated with a more intensive and detailed “focal” processing (Pelz and Canosa, 2001; Unema et al, 2005; Tatler et al, 2006; Over et al, 2007). This distinction appears to be present very early on in development (as young as 2 years old; Helo et al, 2014), and is also associated with the visual features and duration of successive fixations (Jacobs and O’Regan, 1987). Even for visually guided reflexive saccades (i.e., toward a suddenly appearing visual target), the characteristics of saccades depends upon eccentricity, with smaller saccades having better accuracy than larger saccades, which tend to be hypometric, more variable and faster (Frost and Poppel, 1976; Abrams et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Just and Carpenter (1976) analyzed the scan paths of observers making same/different judgments on rotated figures and used the frequency and position of fixations that switch between the figures to divide trials into stages of search, comparison, and confirmation. In addition to the location of fixations, changes in fixation duration are useful markers of a change in strategy or processing, since they increase with the difficulty of the foveal task (Gould, 1967(Gould, , 1973Hooge & Erkelens, 1998;Jacobs, 1986;Jacobs & O'Regan, 1987) and vary between processes such as encoding and comparing (Gould, 1967;Gould & Peeples, 1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%