2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal pattern of erosion in the Three Rivers Region, southeastern Tibet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
87
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3) between 18 and 9 Ma, using burial ages of sediments collected in abandoned caves preserved above tributaries of the Yangtze River. These data are located close to the two bedrock AHe ages of Yang et al (2016) of 38 Ma and 29 Ma and to the altitudinal profile of Shen et al (2016), which yielded AHe ages that range from 31 to 18 Ma and have a positive correlation with elevation, interpreted as a cooling episode related to fluvial incision. Yang et al (2016) also reported a single sample yielding a mean AHe age of 31 Ma (sample Yan08; Fig.…”
Section: Local Incision History and Its Implications For The Cenozoicsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3) between 18 and 9 Ma, using burial ages of sediments collected in abandoned caves preserved above tributaries of the Yangtze River. These data are located close to the two bedrock AHe ages of Yang et al (2016) of 38 Ma and 29 Ma and to the altitudinal profile of Shen et al (2016), which yielded AHe ages that range from 31 to 18 Ma and have a positive correlation with elevation, interpreted as a cooling episode related to fluvial incision. Yang et al (2016) also reported a single sample yielding a mean AHe age of 31 Ma (sample Yan08; Fig.…”
Section: Local Incision History and Its Implications For The Cenozoicsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…If during the Miocene, incision was less than ~2 km (as proposed by McPhillips et al, 2016), then it would have limited effects on the AHe system, which in turn would not record this late incision phase. This could explain why the thermochronometry data (Yang et al, 2016;Shen et al, 2016;Cao et al, 2019) predate the incision history recorded by the burial dating conducted by McPhillips et al (2016). Thus, it is possible that at least two exhumation episodes occurred near the first bend between the Eocene and the Miocene and that uplift (or at least exhumation) occurred through distinct phases.…”
Section: Local Incision History and Its Implications For The Cenozoicmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations