Spatial augmented reality support for design of complex physical environments

Thomas, Bruce H.; Itzstein, Stewart Von; Vernik, Rudi; Porter, Shane; Marner, Michael R.; Smith, Ross; Broecker, Markus; Close, Ben; Walker, Sandy; Pickersgill, Sean; Kelly, Stephen W.; Schumacher, Peter

doi:10.1109/percomw.2011.5766958

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In spatial augmented reality, a room serves as a blank box in which participants use gestures and physical movement (embodiment) to interact with virtual images and text that are projected onto walls or objects in the physical space (Thomas et al 2011). Research has shown that this type of AR experience can improve the work and creativity of participants, and as a result, these spaces can be resources for artists and designers, as well as work spaces for other groups that need to do creative collaborative work (Felip et al 2015).…”

Section: Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Information design opportunities with augmented reality applications

Search¹

2016

IDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interaction design and augmented reality applications map information relationships between physical and virtual worlds. Mobile devices provide new opportunities for integrating digital graphics, text, and sound with the surrounding physical environment. Designers and artists are experimenting with innovative applications that present challenges in information design research and praxis. This paper explores the following dimensions of augmented reality that are integral to applications in information design that use this technology: semiotics of space and time; multisensory design; relational aesthetics, and kinesthetic interaction that incorporates gestures, physical movement, and embodiment into the interactive process.

show abstract

Section: Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Information design opportunities with augmented reality applications

Search¹

2016

IDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We believe there are uses in domains such as design [11,18,27], entertainment [26] and training [21]. The design domain demonstrates some compelling uses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geometrically-Correct Projection-Based Texture Mapping onto a Deformable Object

Fujimoto

Smith

Taketomi

et al. 2014

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Projection-based Augmented Reality commonly employs a rigid substrate as the projection surface and does not support scenarios where the substrate can be reshaped. This investigation presents a projection-based AR system that supports deformable substrates that can be bent, twisted or folded. We demonstrate a new invisible marker embedded into a deformable substrate and an algorithm that identifies deformations to project geometrically correct textures onto the deformable object. The geometrically correct projection-based texture mapping onto a deformable marker is conducted using the measurement of the 3D shape through the detection of the retro-reflective marker on the surface. In order to achieve accurate texture mapping, we propose a marker pattern that can be partially recognized and can be registered to an object's surface. The outcome of this work addresses a fundamental vision recognition challenge that allows the underlying material to change shape and be recognized by the system. Our evaluation demonstrated the system achieved geometrically correct projection under extreme deformation conditions. We envisage the techniques presented are useful for domains including prototype development, design, entertainment and information based AR systems.

show abstract

“…The benefits related to the employment of SAR-based tools in design have already been investigated in the literature. These studies have 20 measured: a decrease in the number and duration of the iterations required during development activities (Marner et al, 2011); a better exchange of ideas while testing and/or validating different design solutions (Porter et al, 2010); a reduction in the language barriers between participants from different backgrounds (Verlinden, 2012); a simplification in the procedures for preparing physical mock-ups (Thomas et al, 2011); a larger exploration of the design space and a more efficient design process (Cascini et al, 2020). Never-25 theless, the majority of current SAR applications still limits the use of the technology to the evaluation or presentation of design solutions, including: visualisation of predefined alternatives (Park et al, 2015); quick collection of annotations (Calixte & Leclercq, 2017); collaborative review (Ben Rajeb & Leclercq, 2014); initial exploration of scenarios (Yu Sheng et al, 2011); functional/ergonomic testing (Port et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%