2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial confinement induces hairpins in nicked circular DNA

Abstract: In living cells, DNA is highly confined in space with the help of condensing agents, DNA binding proteins and high levels of supercoiling. Due to challenges associated with experimentally studying DNA under confinement, little is known about the impact of spatial confinement on the local structure of the DNA. Here, we have used well characterized slits of different sizes to collect high resolution atomic force microscopy images of confined circular DNA with the aim of assessing the impact of the spatial confin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alignment was observed and quantified. us to suggest that a weak confinement experiment offers more information on the fibril characteristics, by bringing into observation kinks or weak regions that were not noticeable in the unconfined state, much like in the case of the circular DNA studied by Japaridze et al [32] In addition, a monotonic decrease in average kink angle as a function the increasing number of kinks, k k n θ 〈 〉 was observed. Simulations showed that this effect could not be solely explained by a specific selectivity of the slits for pre-existing fibril populations, but rather confinement itself induces the conformational change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alignment was observed and quantified. us to suggest that a weak confinement experiment offers more information on the fibril characteristics, by bringing into observation kinks or weak regions that were not noticeable in the unconfined state, much like in the case of the circular DNA studied by Japaridze et al [32] In addition, a monotonic decrease in average kink angle as a function the increasing number of kinks, k k n θ 〈 〉 was observed. Simulations showed that this effect could not be solely explained by a specific selectivity of the slits for pre-existing fibril populations, but rather confinement itself induces the conformational change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Confinement was chosen as it has been extensively studied both theoretically [26][27][28] and, in recent years, experimentally. [29,32,34] A noteworthy example of this was observed by Japaridze et al [32] in the case of circular DNA, where they observed hairpins at the nicked regions of the DNA plasmids when under strong confinement. [29,32,34] A noteworthy example of this was observed by Japaridze et al [32] in the case of circular DNA, where they observed hairpins at the nicked regions of the DNA plasmids when under strong confinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next to the population that showed this linear correlation, a second smaller population (blue data in Figure 5B; and S10D) showed no dependence of the DNA neck width on condensin size. From studying the individual images ( Figure S10), we conclude that the small DNA-neck width of these molecules is caused by interwound structures within the DNA, that likely are induced upon depositing the DNA onto the polylysine-treated mica surface (Japaridze et al, 2017a). Overall, the data suggest that conformational changes of the condensin complex appear to be associated with changes in the width of the stem of the DNA loop that is extruded by condensin.…”
Section: The Neck Width Of the Dna Loop Stem Correlates To The Size Omentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Initially, studies were carried out using fluorescence microscopy [17][18][19]. However, by taking setups applicable to atomic force microscopy (AFM), it is possible to obtain higher resolution images of polymers under confinement [20,21] or extension [22], thus leading to detailed statistical characterization at the single-molecule level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%