2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41465-018-0096-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Contextual Cueing, Assessed in a Computerized Task, Is Not a Limiting Factor for Expert Performance in the Domain of Team Sports or Action Video Game Playing

Abstract: We investigated in two experiments if handball and action video game players show improved implicit learning of repeated spatial configurations for efficient search guidance in comparison to a control group without sport or video game proficiency.To this end, we used both a sport-specific pseudo 3-D contextual cueing task and the original contextual cueing paradigm (Chun & Jiang, 1998). Contextual cueing was present in all groups. However, handball and action video game players did not differ in the strength o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between the displays and the eyes remains constant across participants and room lighting has no influence on the test. Compared to other studies with larger search displays ([ 5 ]), search times have increased. However, the scope of the search displays used here cannot be reached by monitors or projectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distance between the displays and the eyes remains constant across participants and room lighting has no influence on the test. Compared to other studies with larger search displays ([ 5 ]), search times have increased. However, the scope of the search displays used here cannot be reached by monitors or projectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In prior studies of contextual cueing, the complete target-distractor configuration was presented within the field of view of the participants. Even in experiments that used projection systems to create somewhat larger displays [ 5 ], head movements were not necessarily used, because human observers can scan a field of view (FOV) of ca. 180 , using eye movements to bring more peripheral parts of the FOV into focus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of cross-sectional studies involved groups with unmatched gender ratios (i.e., difference greater than 20%). In these cases, we restricted the analysis to only male participants whenever possible (e.g., Kowal et al, 2018;Schmidt et al, 2018Schmidt et al, , 2019Unsworth et al, 2015;Wong & Chang, 2018). If the information reported in the article was either missing, incomplete, or ambiguous, authors were contacted to obtain additional information necessary for effect size computation or moderator coding.…”
Section: Dealing With Duplicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of cross-sectional studies involved groups with unmatched gender ratios (i.e., difference greater than 20%). In these cases, we restricted the analysis to only male participants whenever possible (e.g., Kowal et al, 2018;Schmidt et al, 2018Schmidt et al, , 2019Unsworth et al, 2015;Wong & Chang, 2018). If the information reported in the article was either missing, incomplete, or ambiguous, authors were contacted to obtain additional information necessary for effect size computation or moderator coding.…”
Section: Dealing With Duplicatesmentioning
confidence: 99%