2017
DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial differences in innovation potential of central European regions during posttransformation period

Abstract: Abstract. The article focuses on mapping the innovation potential of the regions inCzech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland having their own elected institutions, which may influence the development of innovation potential of the regions. The correlation analysis and calculation of the aggregate index were used for comparison of the regions. The research is based on the authors' own construction of the Innovation Potential Index which uses 6 indicators: a) GDP per capita in EUR, b) the share of inhabitants with un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Innovations are considered one of the main drivers of growth and competitive advantage, especially in a regional perspective, whereas institutional environment is regarded as a key factor supporting innovativeness of enterprises. The level of innovation varies across regions (Hlaváček and Siviček, 2017;Pater and Lewandowska, 2015;Świadek, 2013;Buerger et al, 2012;Hunady et al, 2017;Moreno et al, 2005;Paci and Usai, 2000). On the one hand, this can result in the availability and quality of local inputs, as well as limitations in the geographical penetration of knowledge (Greunz, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovations are considered one of the main drivers of growth and competitive advantage, especially in a regional perspective, whereas institutional environment is regarded as a key factor supporting innovativeness of enterprises. The level of innovation varies across regions (Hlaváček and Siviček, 2017;Pater and Lewandowska, 2015;Świadek, 2013;Buerger et al, 2012;Hunady et al, 2017;Moreno et al, 2005;Paci and Usai, 2000). On the one hand, this can result in the availability and quality of local inputs, as well as limitations in the geographical penetration of knowledge (Greunz, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an artificial product they supress natural spatial interactions and communication. Additionally, the meaning of borders in the wider context is co-determined by the geographical distribution of the population [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: On the Nature Of Borders In The Light Of Cross-border Activi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are more scientific works, where the dimension of space is taken into account for the studied economic phenomena. The subject literature presents analyses of the spatial diversity of the phenomena studied (see Balcerzak, 2016a;2016b;2017;Nowak, 2018;Semenko et al, 2019), the results of the use of taxonomic methods for region analysis (see Smékalová et al, 2015;Simionescu, 2016;Reiff et al, 2016;Kuc, 2017a;Tvaronavičienė & Razminienė, 2017;Hlaváček & Siviček, 2017;Rollnik-Sadowska & Dąbrowska, 2018;Kljucnikov et al, 2018;Rogalska, 2018;Horská et al, 2019), the results of the use of spatial statistics methods allowing the identification of spatial dependencies and measurement of spatial autocorrelation (see Furková & Chocholatá, 2017) and the results of the use of spatial econometrics models (see Pietrzak, 2012;Bal-Domańska, 2016;Kuc, 2017b).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%