The academic interest in social concepts in city contexts, such as sense of place and social capital, has been growing in the last decades. We present a systematic literature review that confirms the strong relationship between sense of place and social capital, from a social sciences point-of-view. It also reveal that little attention has been paid to their spatial dimensions at the urban level, thereby missing the chance to exploit socio-spatial knowledge to improve the day-to-day life in and functioning of the city (e.g. in planning processes, citizen participation, civic engagement). We therefore examine sense of place and social capital from a Geographic Information Science (GISc) viewpoint, and present a formal conceptualization and initial theoretical framework which explicitly describes both concepts, and the relation between them, within the context of a city and from a spatial point of view.
| INTRODUCTIONSeventeen years have passed since Robert Putnam (2000) pointed out the potential of understanding social capital (SC) as a geographical concept. Since then, more authors have recognized the urgency of a better spatial understanding of the environmental psychological concept "sense of place" (SOP) (Jorgensen & Stedman, 2011;Stedman, 2003).Currently, governments and cities are starting to see the importance of the ability of citizens, firms and organizations to manage and be aware of their spatial footprint in the city (Roche, 2014). On the other hand, in Geographic Information Science (GISc), the importance of place seems to have grown with the development of new concepts such as Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) (Goodchild, 2007), geosocial applications, Geoweb 2.0 and other related concepts. Hence, interesting and potentially useful connections are emerging between social science concepts (SOP and SC) and cities from a GISc point of view, that, nowadays, we are not able to operationalize. Fortunately, the surge of smart cities, with associated Information and Communication Technology (ICT) research and tools, allows new ways to manage the urban environment, which enables new channels of communication. Moreover, geospatial technologies are omnipresent in these new tools, thus demonstrating the growth of interest in the spatial dimension of social con- are often disconnected from society's needs and aspirations (Calzada & Cobo, 2015;Vanolo, 2016). The spatial inclusion in the urban context of citizens' social aspects, such as our feelings, perceptions, and behaviors, form the path toward citizen-centric models and frameworks based on a social-spatial view of a city; that is, it provides an understanding of the social domain (SOP and SC) and its spatial dimensions. Furthermore, we emphasize that GISc can help in compensating for this pervasive lack of social-spatial analysis, by providing theoretical foundation and practical tools to represent and map subjective feelings and experiences.Nowadays, cities use their hierarchical administrative boundaries to deliver their policies and actions...