2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution of acoustic and elastic properties of human femoral cortical bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
32
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated CD and P values are in the range of histomorphometric values reported by Wachter et al 36,37 However, a direct comparison was not possible, because these structural parameters are known to vary considerably even within a single femur at different anatomical locations. 22 Moreover, the different values obtained at 50 and 100 MHz suggest a remaining dependence of the estimated values on the selection of the impedance threshold level. The value used in this study (4 Mrayl) presumably failed to exclude the smallest channels and led to slightly reduced channel size estimations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated CD and P values are in the range of histomorphometric values reported by Wachter et al 36,37 However, a direct comparison was not possible, because these structural parameters are known to vary considerably even within a single femur at different anatomical locations. 22 Moreover, the different values obtained at 50 and 100 MHz suggest a remaining dependence of the estimated values on the selection of the impedance threshold level. The value used in this study (4 Mrayl) presumably failed to exclude the smallest channels and led to slightly reduced channel size estimations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low frequencies (e.g., 5 MHz), the spatial distribution of sound velocity can be assessed in thin sections of human femoral bone. 22 However, because of the limited resolution at this frequency, the sound velocity is affected by structural parameters, for example, pore size and porosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 (2009) Thermal effects in orthotropic porous elastic beams 139 be assumed to be transversely isotropic. However, subsequent investigations have confirmed that in reality, orthotropy is the case that most closely describes mechanical anisotropy of bone [11,13]. The cancellous bone is considered as a porous material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The present paper is concerned with the extension and bending of orthotropic porous cylinders subjected to a plane temperature field. This work is motivated by the recent interest in the using of the orthotropic elastic solid as model for bones (see, e.g., [10][11][12][13]) and for various engineering materials (see, e.g., [14][15][16][17]). The bone tissue is typically described as an orthotropic elastic material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity of ultrasonic propagation parameters have been linked to changes of important properties defining bone quality, including elastic properties [18], [19] and thickness [20], [21]. Although several studies have demonstrated topographical differences of ultrasound velocity in long bones and a decreasing slope from diaphysis toward epiphyses [22], [23], these regularities have not been properly interpreted, nor have they been exploited as a diagnostic feature. Attempts to use shear and surface waves for mapping ultrasonic properties were done using the critical-angle reflectometry [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%