2017
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w5-467-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial DMBS Architecture for a Free and Open Source Bim

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Recent research on the field of Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology, revealed that except of a few, accessible and free BIM viewers there is a lack of Free & Open Source Software (FOSS) BIM software for the complete BIM process. With this in mind and considering BIM as the technological advancement of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) systems, the current work proposes the use of a FOSS CAD software in order to extend its capabilities and transform it gradually into a FOSS BIM platform. Towards … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with Quattrini et al they advocate the potential of web-based game engines to accelerate the availability of more affordable and accessible tools [30]. [31]. To this end, it is clear that survey data as well as the means to deliver it must be made readily available notwithstanding professional concerns of liability that have traditionally resulted in standard statements on architects' drawings such as "all dimensions to be checked on site".…”
Section: Accessibility and Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In line with Quattrini et al they advocate the potential of web-based game engines to accelerate the availability of more affordable and accessible tools [30]. [31]. To this end, it is clear that survey data as well as the means to deliver it must be made readily available notwithstanding professional concerns of liability that have traditionally resulted in standard statements on architects' drawings such as "all dimensions to be checked on site".…”
Section: Accessibility and Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It means, for example, that a built archaeologist and an architect will not segment a building in the same way. Therefore, the information structuration is greatly complexified to manage all viewpoints [33]. Some projects tried to face this problem [34][35][36][37][38], the most efficient application rely on data structure managing temporal information [39] or not that are not directly related to BIM information structure but on ontologies [40], relational databases [41,42] or NoSQL data structures [43].…”
Section: Heritage Bim and Its Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This possibility could include the modification of the definitions of building entities and architectural roles and definitions depending on the project needs and depending on IFC schema limitations and standard regulation. Moreover, the creation of a relational database (created extracting data form IFC models), over the well-known benefits regarding the common recovery of the backup data (Logothetis et al, 2017) is fundamental to collect and query geometric and alphanumeric data (like stratigraphic unit analysis) that can be used to design and manage future interventions, to document the actual condition, to recreate previous situations of the object . The complete analysis of a Cultural Heritage context could be carried out by interacting the extracted data form an IFC model (entities, elements, geometry, materials, etc.)…”
Section: A Not Convetional Hbimmentioning
confidence: 99%