2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522679113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial landmarks regulate a Cdc42-dependent MAPK pathway to control differentiation and the response to positional compromise

Abstract: A fundamental problem in cell biology is to understand how spatial information is recognized and integrated into morphogenetic responses. Budding yeast undergoes differentiation to filamentous growth, which involves changes in cell polarity through mechanisms that remain obscure. Here we define a regulatory input where spatial landmarks (bud-site–selection proteins) regulate the MAPK pathway that controls filamentous growth (fMAPK pathway). The bud-site GTPase Rsr1p regulated the fMAPK pathway through Cdc24p, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
6
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rim101p (Lamb and Mitchell, 2003;Hu et al, 2007), SAGA (Venters et al, 2011) and 420 Rpd3p(L) (Hu et al, 2007;Venters et al, 2011). GIC2 expression is also regulated 421 during mating (Roberts et al, 2000) Here and in Basu et al (2016) we identify cross talk between the polarity pathway 427 and the fMAPK pathway that impacts bud emergence and filamentous growth ( Fig. 7).…”
Section: Discussion 395mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rim101p (Lamb and Mitchell, 2003;Hu et al, 2007), SAGA (Venters et al, 2011) and 420 Rpd3p(L) (Hu et al, 2007;Venters et al, 2011). GIC2 expression is also regulated 421 during mating (Roberts et al, 2000) Here and in Basu et al (2016) we identify cross talk between the polarity pathway 427 and the fMAPK pathway that impacts bud emergence and filamentous growth ( Fig. 7).…”
Section: Discussion 395mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was based on established methods (Piccirillo and 708 Honigberg, 2011) and performed essentially as described (Basu et al, 2016). For some 709 experiments, cells were grown for 16 h in liquid media at 30˚C.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy 707mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bem4p-HA K323A K328A was also defective for invasive growth and expression of the FUS1-HIS3 reporter (Fig. S9), which in strains lacking an intact mating pathway ( ste4 Δ) provides a readout of fMAPK pathway activity ( 39, 52, 58, 94, 95 ). Bem4p-HA K328A was also tested but did not show the same defects in MAPK signaling and invasive growth as Bem4p-HA K323A K328A .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Bem4p might direct Cdc42p, in some manner, to a pathway-specific complex containing Kss1p. Finally, bud-site-selection proteins, culminating on the Ras-type GTPase Rsr1p ( 56, 57 ) also regulate the fMAPK pathway but no other Cdc42p-dependent MAPK pathways ( 58 ). Therefore, at least three Cdc42p-interacting proteins, Msb2p, Bem4p, and Rsr1p regulate the fMAPK pathway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of phosphorylated MAP kinase (P~Kss1p) by immunoblot analysis was performed as described [60][61][62] . Mid-log phase cells were harvested and pellets were washed once with water and stored at -80°C.…”
Section: Immunoblot Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%