2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2003.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial patterns of social organization in the Early Bronze Age of South Scandinavia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has, though, recently been questioned (Johansen et al, 2003), whereas the Late Neolithic society is somehow placed in a grey zone between Stone and Bronze Age as regards social organisation (see Vandkilde, 1996, p. 259). Regarding the Late Neolithic society two diVerent views of social structure are put forward by Ebbesen and Apel.…”
Section: The Late Neolithic Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has, though, recently been questioned (Johansen et al, 2003), whereas the Late Neolithic society is somehow placed in a grey zone between Stone and Bronze Age as regards social organisation (see Vandkilde, 1996, p. 259). Regarding the Late Neolithic society two diVerent views of social structure are put forward by Ebbesen and Apel.…”
Section: The Late Neolithic Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The halberds were mostly discovered as single depositions. Weaponry appears more frequently in graves in Period I of the Early Bronze Age (Lomborg 1965, Vandkilde 1996, Johansen et al 2004. However, this phenomenon is more closely associated to Jutland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have employed least-cost pathway modelling, extensive historical cartographic material and large series of military aerial photographs from the mid-20th century in order to test the relationship between the thousands of round barrows known in the Jutland Peninsula and contemporary routes of communication. And these studies have been able to confirm a close spatial relation between lines of round barrows and pre-modern routes of communication (Egeberg 2004;Johansen et al 2004;Laursen/Johansen 2005). The barrow lines are discernible on several geographical levels.…”
Section: Stone Heap Graves and Barrow Linesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Bakker 1976;1991;Hinz 1950;1953;Willroth 1986). However, it is only very recently that the significance of Müller's observations has started to become re-acknowledged more broadly, as his explanation for the barrow lines has been reintroduced into the understanding of the societies that constructed the round barrows in this region (Holst et al 2001;Jansen 2006;Johansen et al 2004;Nord 2006;Rudebeck 2001;. The neglect that befell Müller's thesis on the barrow lines has had significant impact on the general understanding of the stone heap graves.…”
Section: Stone Heap Graves and Barrow Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%