2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial power spectra of dust across the Local Group: No constraint on disc scale height

Abstract: We analyze the 1D spatial power spectra of dust surface density and mid to far-infrared emission at 24-500 µm in the LMC, SMC, M31, and M33. By forward-modelling the pointspread-function (PSF) on the power spectrum, we find that nearly all power spectra have a single power-law and point source component. A broken power-law model is only favoured for the LMC 24 µm MIPS power spectrum and is due to intense dust heating in 30 Doradus. We also test for local power spectrum variations by splitting the LMC and SMC m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(243 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The projected fractal dimension, which is related to the slope of the TPCF, is different if we are looking at the projection of a thin slice (2D) rather than a thick disc (3D), and this projection effect leads to a change in the slope (see, Sánchez & Alfaro 2008, for detailed models). Observations of neutral hydrogen, far-infrared dust, and γ -ray emission in nearby external galaxies are consistent with this mechanism [Elmegreen, Kim & Staveley-Smith 2001;Miville-Deschênes et al 2003;Ingalls et al 2004;Dutta et al 2009;Szotkowski et al 2019;Besserglik & Goldman 2021, although see Koch et al (2020) for an alternative explanation for this transition]. However, our cluster TPCFs are not: as discussed in , this transition should lead to a steeper slope at larger separations and a shallower ones at smaller separations, which is the opposite of what we find.…”
Section: Model Pw: Piecewise Power Lawsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The projected fractal dimension, which is related to the slope of the TPCF, is different if we are looking at the projection of a thin slice (2D) rather than a thick disc (3D), and this projection effect leads to a change in the slope (see, Sánchez & Alfaro 2008, for detailed models). Observations of neutral hydrogen, far-infrared dust, and γ -ray emission in nearby external galaxies are consistent with this mechanism [Elmegreen, Kim & Staveley-Smith 2001;Miville-Deschênes et al 2003;Ingalls et al 2004;Dutta et al 2009;Szotkowski et al 2019;Besserglik & Goldman 2021, although see Koch et al (2020) for an alternative explanation for this transition]. However, our cluster TPCFs are not: as discussed in , this transition should lead to a steeper slope at larger separations and a shallower ones at smaller separations, which is the opposite of what we find.…”
Section: Model Pw: Piecewise Power Lawsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We fit the structure functions with power-law functions of the form S s ( ) ∝ ζ 2 . We set the lower and upper limits of our fitting range to the beam size 88 (0.65 pc and 0.07 pc for the GMCs in the disc and CMZ, respectively) and the approximate scale above which the structure functions begin to turn over (4 pc and 0.7 pc for the GMCs in the disc and CMZ, respectively).…”
Section: Analysis Of Multi-dimensional Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projected fractal dimension, which is related to the slope of the TPCF, is different if we are looking at the projection of a thin slice (2D) rather than a thick disk (3D), and this projection effect leads to a change in the slope (see, Sánchez & Alfaro 2008, for detailed models). Observations of neutral hydrogen, Far-Infrared (FIR) dust, and 𝛾-ray emission in nearby external galaxies are consistent with this mechanism Miville-Deschênes et al 2003;Ingalls et al 2004;Dutta et al 2009;Szotkowski et al 2019;Besserglik & Goldman 2021, although see Koch et al (2020) for an alternative explanation for this transition). However, our cluster TPCFs are not: as discussed in , this transition should lead to a steeper slope at larger separations and a shallower ones at smaller separations, which is the opposite of what we find.…”
Section: Model Pw: Piecewise Power Lawmentioning
confidence: 91%