Spatial relationship between soil hydraulic and soil physical properties in a farm field

Abstract

The relationship between soil properties may vary with their spatial separation. Understanding this relationship is important in predicting hydraulic parameters from other soil physical properties. The objective of this study was to identify spatially dependent relationships between hydraulic parameters and soil physical properties. Regularly spaced (3-m) undisturbed soil samples were collected along a 384 m transect from a farm field at Smeaton, Saskatchewan. Saturated hydraulic conductivity, the soil water retention curve, and soil physical properties were measured. The scaling parameter, van Genuchten scaling parameter α (VGα), and curve shape parameter, van Genuchten curve shape parameter n (VGn), were obtained by fitting the van Genuchten model to measured soil moisture retention data. Results showed that the semivariograms of soil properties exhibited two different spatial structures at spatial separations of 20 and 120 m, respectively. A strong spatial structure was observed in organic carbon, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), sand, and silt; whereas a weak structure was found for VGα and VGn. Correlation circle analysis showed strong spatially dependent relationships of Ks and VGα; with soil physical properties, but weak relationships of θs and VGn with soil physical properties. The spatially dependent relationships between soil physical and soil hydraulic parameters should be taken into consideration when developing pedotransfer functions. Key words: Spatial relationship, geostatistics, linear coregionalization model, principal component analysis, pedotransfer function

Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Carbon Dioxide Flux in Crop and Grass Land‐Use Systems

“…Spatial correlations between soil respiration and some of the selected soil properties were not found or were only weak, possibly due to the scale of variability for the soil respiration rate and the selected property being different. Correlations between variables may be misinterpreted if their scales of variability were ignored in the presence of scale‐dependent processes and relationships (Biswas and Si, 2009; Riveros‐Iregui and McGlynn, 2009). Allaire et al (2012) concluded that stronger correlations between soil respiration and soil properties were obtained when different scales rather than total variability were considered in the analysis.…”

Impact of soil surface characteristics on soil water content variability in agricultural fields

“…The variability of soil WC is a primary issue when allocating point measurements from remote sensing to spatial distributions and in moving between landscape scales in hydrological modelling (Crow and Wood, ; Choi and Jacobs, ). Soil WC at any point expresses the underlying hydrological processes that vary with scale (Kim and Stricker, ; Oldak et al ., ; Famiglietti et al ., ; Zhao et al ., ), soil texture (Kätterer et al ., ; Biswas and Si, ; Nasta et al ., ), soil depth (De Lannoy et al ., ; Choi and Jacobs, ; Adams et al ., ) and time (Jacobs et al ., ; Jawson and Niemann, ; Zhao et al ., ).…”

Multiscale spatial variability of CO2 emissions and correlations with physico-chemical soil properties

“…This has also been demonstrated for gas emissions (de Figueiredo Brito et al, 2009;Kosugi et al, 2007;Lark et al, 2004;van den Heuvel et al, 2009). Thus, in the presence of scale-dependent processes and relationships, correlations between variables may be misinterpreted if their scales of variability are ignored (Biswas and Si, 2009;Riveros-Iregui and McGlynn, 2009).…”