2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial resolution for EEG source reconstruction—A simulation study on SEPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a quantitative evaluation is needed to assess how much task-relevant cortical source activity and dynamics were captured in the VBMEG method. In this proof of principle study, we assessed the performance of EEG source localization and LCD modeling in the VBMEG method by the VAF (Vlaar et al, 2017 ; Kalogianni et al, 2018b ). The VAF is a summary of how much of the variability of the data can be explained by a fitted model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a quantitative evaluation is needed to assess how much task-relevant cortical source activity and dynamics were captured in the VBMEG method. In this proof of principle study, we assessed the performance of EEG source localization and LCD modeling in the VBMEG method by the VAF (Vlaar et al, 2017 ; Kalogianni et al, 2018b ). The VAF is a summary of how much of the variability of the data can be explained by a fitted model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of source localization and dynamic information flow estimation was evaluated by calculating the VAF (Vlaar et al, 2017 ; Kalogianni et al, 2018b ). For source localization, the estimated sources were used to generate an estimated EEG signal , which was compared with collected EEG signal M .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fMRI has high spatial resolution (at the millimetre level), but its low temporal resolution limits its ability to image transient neural activity (Eichele et al, 2005; Goldman et al, 2009; Walz et al, 2014; Iannaccone et al, 2015). EEG and its magnetic counterpart, MEG, have high temporal resolution (at the millisecond level) while their spatial resolution is low due to the inverse problem (Kalogianni et al, 2018): that is, the problem of extracting 3D source activity within the brain from 2D scalp recordings is ill-posed because different source configurations can generate the same electric potentials on the scalp (Helmholtz, 1853; Kalogianni et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,[40][41][42][43][44] Although these results cannot simply be correlated with human experiments, it suggests the brain's remaining activity may explain the NDE. 45,46 As mentioned earlier, we have found, from anecdotal observations, that occasionally, when teaching CP to students, they would relive their previous NDE experience during their CP. Hence, it became clear that the four attributes described by Moody 47,48 to NDEs also applied to SCEs.…”
Section: Ceeg For Nde and Scementioning
confidence: 55%