2007
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200675685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial resolution in Bragg‐magnified X‐ray images as determined by Fourier analysis

Abstract: The spatial resolution of an imaging system is most often experimentally determined by using model objects and idealized imaging conditions. This traditional approach does not properly take into account the influence of noise and the dependence of contrast on the object. The latter influence is essential especially in the case of magnified X‐ray images acquired by two fold asymmetric Bragg diffraction. For this phase sensitive technique the application of a criterion for spatial resolution based upon Fourier a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each sector of the beamshaper produces a spot in the back-focal plane of the objective lens. The resolution of the system has been measured according to Modregger et al [12]: we obtained a value of 133 nm for 2D images and 144 nm for 3D images, i.e. very close to the Rayleigh limit of R Rayleigh = 1.22r = 122 nm.…”
Section: Instrumentationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Each sector of the beamshaper produces a spot in the back-focal plane of the objective lens. The resolution of the system has been measured according to Modregger et al [12]: we obtained a value of 133 nm for 2D images and 144 nm for 3D images, i.e. very close to the Rayleigh limit of R Rayleigh = 1.22r = 122 nm.…”
Section: Instrumentationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In both cases, the effective spatial resolution limit was determined by the intersection point (black arrows) of an averaged PSD curve and twice the level of featureless region dominated by noise. 27 The cut-off frequencies indicate therefore the half-period spatial resolution limits of the amplitude image at 10.1 nm and of the phase shift image at 10 nm, which are very close to the pixel size (8.3 nm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It means that improving the temporal resolution by a factor of 7.5 the SNR gets poorer by only a factor of 2. The spatial resolutions evaluated with two methods, the first based on the power spectrum of the images [7] the second by fitting the line profiles, does not show a trend similar to SNR. The spatial resolution remains uneffected at a value of about 2.5 pixels for all scans.…”
Section: Static Sample: Optimization Of the Scan Qualitymentioning
confidence: 92%