2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial resolution limits for the localization of noise sources using direct sound mapping

Abstract: One of the main challenges arising from noise and vibration problems is how to identify the areas of a device, machine or structure that produce significant acoustic excitation, i.e. the localization of main noise sources. The direct visualization of sound, in particular sound intensity, has extensively been used for many years to locate sound sources. However, it is not yet well defined when two sources should be regarded as resolved by means of direct sound mapping. This paper derives the limits of the direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In evaluation of beamform maps, involving subjectivity (visual inspection), the arbitrary use of the Rayleigh limit [8,13,14], as well as the Sparrow limit [13,15] is widespread. The application of the Rayleigh criterion and the Full Width at Half Maximum criterion is investigated in [18], where alternative limits are also introduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evaluation of beamform maps, involving subjectivity (visual inspection), the arbitrary use of the Rayleigh limit [8,13,14], as well as the Sparrow limit [13,15] is widespread. The application of the Rayleigh criterion and the Full Width at Half Maximum criterion is investigated in [18], where alternative limits are also introduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the experimental results in figure 10, the peak to valley ratios with 160 iterations for the 1.0 mm and 0.8 mm rods were 1.53 and 1.14 respectively. Using the Rayleigh criterion of separating two peaks, which is having a peak to valley ratio of 1.23 [19], the 1.0 mm rods were resolved, but the 0.8 mm rods were not.…”
Section: Peak To Valley Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a near-field error 12 in the sound intensity test, which will be smaller when the double microphones are closer to the sound source. And the Rayleigh criterion 13 holds that the spatial resolution of sound field imaging is related to the 1 School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China 2 distance from the microphone to the sound source surface. So the conventional sound intensity test does not obtain high-resolution sound intensity images to accurately distinguish the dense and complex excitation sources inside the motor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%