1984
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90111-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scale processing is a low-level task which has been shown to precede many early visual tasks such as motion (Morgan, 1992), stereopsis (Legge & Gu, 1989;Schor, Wood & Ogawa, 1984), depth perception (Marshall, Burbeck, Ariely, Rolland, & Martin, 1996) and saccade programming (Findlay, Brogan, & Wenban-Smith, 1993). Following the psychophysics of sinewave gratings, psychological and computational recognition research has often assumed that coarse blobs should be recognized before fine boundary edges in complex visual stimuli such as faces, objects, and scenes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale processing is a low-level task which has been shown to precede many early visual tasks such as motion (Morgan, 1992), stereopsis (Legge & Gu, 1989;Schor, Wood & Ogawa, 1984), depth perception (Marshall, Burbeck, Ariely, Rolland, & Martin, 1996) and saccade programming (Findlay, Brogan, & Wenban-Smith, 1993). Following the psychophysics of sinewave gratings, psychological and computational recognition research has often assumed that coarse blobs should be recognized before fine boundary edges in complex visual stimuli such as faces, objects, and scenes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Clifton Schor and colleagues have conducted a systematic characterization of our sensitivity to depth from transient and sustained disparity (Schor et al, 2001(Schor et al, , 1998(Schor et al, , 1984Edwards et al, 2000Edwards et al, , 1999aPope et al, 1999). These studies have shown different 1) spatial tuning, 2) tendency to depth-alias, 3) orientation tuning, 4) sensitivity to spatial envelope size, and 5) tolerance for opposite polarity, for long vs. short duration depth stimuli.…”
Section: Functional Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived depth of the rivalling gratings may be seen to lie in the plane of the ¢xation spot (see also Wurger & Landy 1989). Schor et al (1984) have measured DDTs for ¢rst-order stimuli. They used di¡erence-of-Gaussian (DoG) signals and found that the DDTs decreased as the peak frequency of the DoG functions increased (up to 2.5 cpd).…”
Section: K Langley and Others Linear And Nonlinear Transparencies Inmentioning
confidence: 99%