2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially weighted order binary pattern for color texture classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods construct image descriptors by concatenating all feature histograms extracted from each color channel. The inter‐channel feature extraction methods include maLBP [ 29 ] , mdLBP [ 29 ] , QLRBP [ 31 ] , LBPC [ 32 ] , SWOBP [ 33 ] and our CCBP. In addition, two non‐LBP‐based methods ( i.e ., Dense color histogram (DCH) [ 42 ] and Color name (CN) [ 43 ] ) are also compared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These methods construct image descriptors by concatenating all feature histograms extracted from each color channel. The inter‐channel feature extraction methods include maLBP [ 29 ] , mdLBP [ 29 ] , QLRBP [ 31 ] , LBPC [ 32 ] , SWOBP [ 33 ] and our CCBP. In addition, two non‐LBP‐based methods ( i.e ., Dense color histogram (DCH) [ 42 ] and Color name (CN) [ 43 ] ) are also compared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrate that CCBP is robust to image rotation as well as Gaussian noise. [12] 88.45 77.06 55.88 39.56 32.35 22.94 CLBP [13] 84.12 76.62 67.28 58.24 53.24 41.69 SLGP [16] 76.76 76.40 59.85 45.88 41.84 36.91 LTP [17] 93.75 90.66 75.59 58.90 47.72 35.81 NRLBP [18] 88.01 87.21 87.06 82.94 77.13 67.43 BRINT [20] 79.41 75.59 71.92 69.34 68.01 63.75 maLBP [29] 82.87 76.99 57.50 46.18 36.03 26.62 mdLBP [29] 86.40 81.47 58.16 42.64 36.03 27.43 QLRBP [31] 81.47 28.60 19.56 16.18 15.96 14.26 LBPC [32] 84.40 73.60 61.18 52.43 45.52 35.66 SWOBP [33] 94.71 90.44 81.47 74.48 73.90 64.27 DCH [42] 91.32 90.88 87.82 84.67 82.86 77.72 CN [43] 82 [12] 88.02 81.83 69.44 57.04 50.06 36.72 CLBP [13] 95.07 85.61 72.54 61.14 54.71 42.90 SLGP [16] 89.23 84.84 69.17 55.65 47.80 39.31 LTP [17] 94.09 90.53 85.87 80.45 75.62 66.53 NRLBP [18] 67.34 66.98 64.90 64.69 61.28 54.28 BRINT [20] 91.16 89.44 84.47 79.94 76.45 66.53 maLBP [29] 85.09 80.80 66.49 54.86 47.93 37.22 mdLBP [29] 85.45 82.77 68.13 56.88 48.58 37.93 QLRBP [31] 56.34 19.95 14.24 12.18 11.79 11.70 LBPC [32] 43.76 43.62 36.64 31.83 28.27 22.64 SWOBP [33] 89.60 88.88 85.21 80.12 77.98 73.45 DCH [42] 88.35 86.61 83.42 81.61 79.77 76.86 CN [43] 79 3) Results on the KTH-TIPS2-b database As shown in Table 4, the compared methods show competitive classification results on the KTH-TIPS2-b database. When images are slightly corrupted by noise (i.e., SNR=100), SWOBP works better than CCBP 3 (64.56% vs. 62.32% in classification accuracy), and they are followed by LTP (60.97%) and BRINT (60.10%).…”
Section: Classification Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we compare it with the last texture characterization method, SWOBP [58], on CUReT and KTH-TIPS texture datasets. The experimental results are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al. [41] worked on the classification of textures for which they have proposed a spatially weighted order binary pattern (SWOBP) by introducing a colour gradient channel and exploring a multi‐channel colour order pattern for finding features from images. Local multiple patterns (LMP) feature descriptor proposed by Wankou et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%