2021
DOI: 10.1049/ipr2.12166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards accurate classification of skin cancer from dermatology images

Abstract: Skin cancer is the most well-known disease found in the individuals who are exposed to the Sun's ultraviolet (UV) radiations. It is identified when skin tissues on the epidermis grow in an uncontrolled manner and appears to be of different colour than the normal skin tissues. This paper focuses on predicting the class of dermascopic images as benign and malignant. A new feature extraction method has been proposed to carry out this work which can extract relevant features from image texture. Local and gradient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The confusion matrix and the categorization outcomes for the photos from the ISIC 2016 dataset are shown in Table 4 and Table 5 . Compared to LBP (Local Binary Pattern), CLDP (Color Local Directional Pattern) [ 18 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ] has the highest accuracy. The accuracy of 97.2 percent shows that, compared to GLCM [ 59 ], LBP more accurately captures the texture of skin cancer images [ 18 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The confusion matrix and the categorization outcomes for the photos from the ISIC 2016 dataset are shown in Table 4 and Table 5 . Compared to LBP (Local Binary Pattern), CLDP (Color Local Directional Pattern) [ 18 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ] has the highest accuracy. The accuracy of 97.2 percent shows that, compared to GLCM [ 59 ], LBP more accurately captures the texture of skin cancer images [ 18 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDP more successfully recovers the spatial data of the texture, edges, and opponent color information while also removing noise. Other feature descriptors, such as LTP, Color SIFT, Gradient information, CLDP, Color Gabor wavelet, and multi-feature extraction, do not completely reduce the noise [ 8 , 18 , 55 , 56 , 58 ]. In contrast to LBP and additional descriptors used in the existing methods for the diagnosis of skin lesions, SDP is likewise insensitive to changes in light.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few years, segmentation methods based on digital image processing (DIP) or deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) have demonstrated remarkable success on dermoscopy images, attracting the attention of a large number of researchers. Most of the previous work on skin lesion image segmentation is based on fully supervised [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] or semisupervised [9]. Typically, DCNN requires pixel-level annotation, but pixel-level annotation of dermoscopy images requires the diagnosis of a large number of professional doctors, which is extremely difficult for collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%