2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal representativeness of euphotic depth in situ sampling in transitional coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in-situ sampling may provide inaccurate measurements within its surrounding on different days (Erkkilä and Kalliola, 2004). Even though measurements may be highly accurate for a specific spot, the data may not correspond well with a sample taken at a nearby location (Luhtala and Tolvanen, 2016). Additionally, sampling location is an important factor for effectiveness of water quality monitoring.…”
Section: Limitations Of Water Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in-situ sampling may provide inaccurate measurements within its surrounding on different days (Erkkilä and Kalliola, 2004). Even though measurements may be highly accurate for a specific spot, the data may not correspond well with a sample taken at a nearby location (Luhtala and Tolvanen, 2016). Additionally, sampling location is an important factor for effectiveness of water quality monitoring.…”
Section: Limitations Of Water Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental conditions vary due to the presence of islands and shallow topography, causing the seasonal developments (i.e., timing and magnitude) of, e.g., algal growth, to differ within small areas-numerous previous studies, which have utilised in situ and remotely sensed data and spatial modelling, highlight these features in the SW Finnish archipelago in terms of spatial [11,24,25], temporal [9,12,26], and spatio-temporal variability [10,27]. Many studies conclude that the variation is difficult to capture, and it is advisable to use combined methods to complement in situ sampling (e.g., [9][10][11][12]26]). However, to our knowledge, the four-dimensional (temporal, vertical and horizontal) patterns of water quality have not yet been statistically quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standards and guidelines have been published for the in situ determination of river water parameters or for the collection and preservation of samples that can be analyzed in the laboratory. Some authors also studied the impact of river composition heterogeneity in the characterization of a sampling point. However, when trends of river water composition need to be monitored, it is necessary to characterize a large river area because it is more robust to river’s heterogeneity and representative of its status. This area would be characterized by the parameter value that would be obtained after mixing and analyzing the water of the river area that is equivalent to the mean of the parameter values determined in the area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%