Spatio-temporal stiffness optimization with switching dynamics

Abstract

We address the optimal control problem of robotic systems with variable stiffness actuation (VSA) including switching dynamics and discontinuous state transitions. Our focus in this paper is to consider dynamic tasks that have multiple phases of movement, contacts and impacts with the environment with a requirement of exploiting passive dynamics of the system. By modelling such tasks as a hybrid dynamical system with time-based switching, we develop a systematic methodology to simultaneously optimize control commands, time-varying stiffness profiles and temporal aspect of the movement such as switching instances and total movement duration to exploit the benefits of VSA. Numerical evaluations on a brachiating robot driven with VSA Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

Online Hybrid Motion Planning for Dyadic Collaborative Manipulation via Bilevel Optimization

“…4. Motivated by the key observations mentioned in Section IV and inspired by the bilevel method presented in [61] as well as the "Mixed-Logic Program" [57], we combine the two formulations presented in (7) and (8) into a single bilevel optimization formulation, as follows…”

A Series-elastic Robot for Back-pain Rehabilitation

“…To address this problem, we employ a two-bar linkage mechanism that will reduce the complexity and weight of the mechanism, making the system easier to control and more applicable to use. It is similar to the mechanism in [63], which use a variable stiffness actuator with two motors. In contrast, here, we only design one actuating input at the elbow joint for swinging.…”

Time-Energy Optimal Trajectory Planning for Variable Stiffness Actuated Robot

“…Through the transformation of the state vector, the inequality constraints about angles of stiffness adjusting motor θ stiff and deformations ϕ(q, θ) are eliminated and embedded into the system dynamics, which means that under the control threshold in (19) the state inequality constraint of deformation in (12) and stiffness motor position in (11) will not be violated. However, except these embedded constraints, there are other constraints that cannot be embedded into the system dynamics.…”

“…Substituting the new system state (20), (23) and control variables (19), the new state-space dynamic can be represented asẋ…”

“…However, the study of trajectory planning for variable stiffness actuated robot is still ongoing. Furthermore, considering a task specific scenario, like a ping-pong playing task [18], a gymnastics-like task [19], a ball-throwing task [6] or a hand-shake task, it is the absence of priori knowledge about how to modulate the stiffness to achieve target performance of these tasks. Obviously, monitoring the arm stiffness variation performance of the human arm while executing a predefined task is one straight and exprimental way to obtain the control law of stiffness.…”