2017
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2017.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Aspects of Engagement during Dialogic Storytelling Child–Robot Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the motivational perspective, the engagement of the learner is a relevant factor for the efficient and sustainable acquisition of knowledge (Finn and Zimmer 2012;Rodgers 2008). Engagement in the context of a social interaction is to be seen as the combination of the factors attention and understanding (Heath et al 2017), as the basis of an interaction process within which people establish, maintain and end a connection with each other (Sidner et al 2005). In the learning context, engagement describes the active and emotional involvement as well as the workload of the learner as quality criteria of the user experience (Beer et al 2010;O'Brien et al 2018).…”
Section: Motivation and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the motivational perspective, the engagement of the learner is a relevant factor for the efficient and sustainable acquisition of knowledge (Finn and Zimmer 2012;Rodgers 2008). Engagement in the context of a social interaction is to be seen as the combination of the factors attention and understanding (Heath et al 2017), as the basis of an interaction process within which people establish, maintain and end a connection with each other (Sidner et al 2005). In the learning context, engagement describes the active and emotional involvement as well as the workload of the learner as quality criteria of the user experience (Beer et al 2010;O'Brien et al 2018).…”
Section: Motivation and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, for children's speech, when the childrobot task requires them to use speech, it is still possible that children are answering the question in order to continue with the task without being actively task-engaged. Other studies measure the body posture of the child and the distance to the robot (Heath et al, 2017;Sanghvi et al, 2011), sometimes in combination with speech (Javed, Lee, & Park, 2020;Jeong, Breazeal, Logan, & Weinstock, 2018) or in combination with touch behavior on a tablet (Vázquez, Steinfeld, Hudson, & Forlizzi, 2014). However, these studies do not take into account that the task might require children to move around and children are in general more active and move around more than adults.…”
Section: Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers developing a storytelling robot interacting with children aged 4–5 years have confirmed the importance of temporal features in the pragmatics of interactions. Contingent responses from the robot, in relation to the attentional and social cues signaled by the children, were indeed found to facilitate engagement of the latter ( Heath et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Pragmatics In Hri: Which Ingredients Are Necessary For Effecmentioning
confidence: 99%