2014
DOI: 10.4161/cam.28182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal organization and mechanosensory function of podosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, rigidity sensing of the substratum probably involves forces generated between the growing actin network of the core and the more stable layer of unbranched actin filaments that surrounds the core (Fig. 3b) [75,87]. In contrast, other functions such as degradation of matrix material requires the recruitment of additional factors such as matrix-lytic enzymes that have to be delivered by microtubule-dependent transport [53,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, rigidity sensing of the substratum probably involves forces generated between the growing actin network of the core and the more stable layer of unbranched actin filaments that surrounds the core (Fig. 3b) [75,87]. In contrast, other functions such as degradation of matrix material requires the recruitment of additional factors such as matrix-lytic enzymes that have to be delivered by microtubule-dependent transport [53,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability for mechano/rigidity sensing is probably based on the specific architecture of podosomes, which combines a protrusive actin network in the core, an adhesive module in the ring, and a coupling of both systems by contractile actomyosin cables that connect the top of the podosome with the adhesive ring [75,87] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Substrate Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The close relationship or the independence between these two functions could be a way to differentiate and classify invadosomes. 7 The crosstalk between the adhesive ring and the protrusive core is also the central point of the commentary by Koen van den Dries, et al 8 This dialog coupled with the molecular composition between the core and the ring are also covered in the commentary by Bravo-Cordeo, et al 9 In this commentary, the authors highlight that while the presence of p190RhoGEF at the ring activates RhoC, p190RhoGAP inhibits RhoC at the core to regulate invadopodia protrusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%