2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal patterns and spatial clustering characteristics of air quality in China: A city level analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…air quality of 338 Chinese cities at the prefecture level and above, Ye et al [46] found that the air quality index of SO 2 and NO 2 in Xinjiang was basically less than 1; that is, Xinjiang experienced low SO 2 and NO 2 pollution and had a good environment, consistent with the results reported in this paper. Sun and Zhou [47] discussed the source analysis and spatial distribution characteristics of air pollution in China as well as the relationship between air pollution and exposure risks.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…air quality of 338 Chinese cities at the prefecture level and above, Ye et al [46] found that the air quality index of SO 2 and NO 2 in Xinjiang was basically less than 1; that is, Xinjiang experienced low SO 2 and NO 2 pollution and had a good environment, consistent with the results reported in this paper. Sun and Zhou [47] discussed the source analysis and spatial distribution characteristics of air pollution in China as well as the relationship between air pollution and exposure risks.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 1 shows the Comprehensive Air Quality Index (CAQI) in GZ and ZJ from 2015 to 2018 9‐12 . The CAQI is a dimensionless air quality index for the description and measurement of ambient air quality that covers six pollutants and a greater CAQI indicates worse air quality 13 . Based on the CAQI values, Guangzhou was considered to have worse air quality compared with Zhanjiang.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed, all tests except the robust LM test for spatial error effect are significant at the 1% level, indicating that spatial dependence should not be ignored. The presence of spatial dependence of air emissions has also been observed in previous studies, including Wang and Fang (2016) for analyzing the spatiotemporal distribution and determinants of PM 2.5 concentrations, Ye et al (2018) for examining spatiotemporal patterns and spatial clustering characteristics of six air pollutants, Li et al (2019) for illustrating the spatiotemporal variation and key factors of SO 2 concentrations, and Wang and Zhou (2021) for demonstrating spatial agglomeration and driving factors of SO 2 emissions and solid waste.…”
Section: Estimation Results Without Consideration Of Spatial Dependencementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Nevertheless, evidence against the EKC hypothesis has also been provided. For example, a U-shaped relation between income and SO 2 concentrations was suggested by Kaufmann et al (1998); Shen (2006); Ye et al (2018). An N-shaped relationship between gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and SO 2 emissions was found by Llorca and Meunié (2009) and Huang (2018).…”
Section: Economic Driving Factors Of So 2 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 96%