2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker verification score normalization using speaker model clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 1: Data Preprocessing. To eliminate difference between sensor data of different measurement standards, Zscore normalization is performed on the raw data [33]. Meanwhile, there are so many factors which influence on dissolved oxygen.…”
Section: The Hybrid Prediction Model Based On K-means and Iga-elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 1: Data Preprocessing. To eliminate difference between sensor data of different measurement standards, Zscore normalization is performed on the raw data [33]. Meanwhile, there are so many factors which influence on dissolved oxygen.…”
Section: The Hybrid Prediction Model Based On K-means and Iga-elmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each target, the nearest Tnorm impostors are chosen to normalize the scores. A different approach which performs k-means clustering in order to select a subset of impostors for Z-norm and T-norm is proposed in [2].…”
Section: Score Normalization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], the cohort selection is performed by using k-means to cluster the normalization models and choosing the nearest cluster to the target model. However this approach is proposed for text-independent speaker verification, where the target and normalization models are trained with different lexical contents of the enrolment data.…”
Section: Cohort Selection For Text-dependent Speaker Verificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shifts and scales are usually estimated using a set of utterances so called normalization cohort. It has been shown many times that for GMM-UBM algorithms [4,1] and later especially for Joint Factor Analysis (JFA) based system [5,6], we might achieve significantly better accuracy with score normalization, such as Z-norm [4], T-norm [7], combinations of both (TZ-norm and ZTnorm) [8] or other variants such as H-norm [1], D-norm [9], KL-T-norm [10], S-norm [11], normalized cosine similarity [12], speaker clusters [13] and many others [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%