2013
DOI: 10.46538/hlj.10.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaking Punjabi(s): Heritage Language Socialization and Language Ideologies in a Sikh Education Program

Abstract: This ethnographic study of a Punjabi Sikh religious education program in the United States examines how different linguistic codes that constitute Punjabi heritage languages are tied to Sikh notions of moral personhood and ethno-religious community. This article analyzes two distinct activities: Gurbani (prayer recitation) and Sikh youth discussion classes. In Gurbani classes, children and youth are taught to perform verses from Sikh scriptures, which are writ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last predictor for HL competence in the formal register was the frequency of worship service in the HL. The significance of this predictor for the model can be explained by the fact that when attending a religious service, speakers are confronted with a highly ritualized and strictly formulaic, often archaic language (Klein 2013). Furthermore, in addition to prayers and sermons, religious classes offered by particular religious institutions are also often taught in related HLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last predictor for HL competence in the formal register was the frequency of worship service in the HL. The significance of this predictor for the model can be explained by the fact that when attending a religious service, speakers are confronted with a highly ritualized and strictly formulaic, often archaic language (Klein 2013). Furthermore, in addition to prayers and sermons, religious classes offered by particular religious institutions are also often taught in related HLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%