2007
DOI: 10.2989/102201107780178186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Feature: Revisiting the Brotherton Burning Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand these dynamics long-term, the Brotherton Fire Experiment (1981-1992 and 2015-present; South Africa; Figure 2) at Cathedral Peak in the Maloti-Drakensberg was established as a small-scale mesocosm-type fire experiment using 1-, 2-, 5-, and 12year fire-return interval treatments to complement the larger research catchment-scale fire experiment discussed previously [69][70][71]. The experiment is generally sampled biennially, but occasionally on an ad hoc basis [71][72][73]. In 2004, a multi-disciplinary team of scientists used the fire experiment to convince the management authority of its importance by including a broader suite of biodiversity elements and the potential for climate change research [73].…”
Section: Fire Management and Policy That Optimizes Grassland Biodiversity Resilience And Water Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand these dynamics long-term, the Brotherton Fire Experiment (1981-1992 and 2015-present; South Africa; Figure 2) at Cathedral Peak in the Maloti-Drakensberg was established as a small-scale mesocosm-type fire experiment using 1-, 2-, 5-, and 12year fire-return interval treatments to complement the larger research catchment-scale fire experiment discussed previously [69][70][71]. The experiment is generally sampled biennially, but occasionally on an ad hoc basis [71][72][73]. In 2004, a multi-disciplinary team of scientists used the fire experiment to convince the management authority of its importance by including a broader suite of biodiversity elements and the potential for climate change research [73].…”
Section: Fire Management and Policy That Optimizes Grassland Biodiversity Resilience And Water Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment is generally sampled biennially, but occasionally on an ad hoc basis [71][72][73]. In 2004, a multi-disciplinary team of scientists used the fire experiment to convince the management authority of its importance by including a broader suite of biodiversity elements and the potential for climate change research [73]. The original aim was to assess the effects of pyrodiversity (varied fire frequency and seasonality treatments) on mesic montane grass structure (basal cover) and composition (diversity) [72], but has been expanded to test the effects of fire on forb species composition and diversity [66], soil properties and landscape functioning [74], invertebrate diversity and abundance [75], and multi-decadal changes in grass and forb species composition in concert [69,70].…”
Section: Fire Management and Policy That Optimizes Grassland Biodiversity Resilience And Water Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven of the original replicated burning treatments have been largely maintained for almost forty years. Interim analyses of the treatment effects on grass (Morris et al 1999;Short 2001Short , 2004 and forb species composition and diversity (Uys et al 2004), soil properties and landscape functioning (Manson et al 2007), and invertebrate richness and abundance (Uys and Hamer 2007) have been undertaken (Short 2007), but multidecadal changes in grass and forb species composition in the BBT have not been assessed.…”
Section: Frequent Burning Maintained a Stable Grassland Over Four Decmentioning
confidence: 99%