2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special issue: Tissue reactions to ionizing radiation exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most comprehensive study to date (Barnard et al 2019 ) exposed C57BL/6 mice to gamma-radiation at 0.84, 3.7, or 18 Gy/h, and found an inverse dose rate response in cataract formation in the lens of the eye. This supports previous epidemiological evidence as reviewed in Hamada et al ( 2016 ).…”
Section: Experimental Evidence Of a Dose Rate Effectsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most comprehensive study to date (Barnard et al 2019 ) exposed C57BL/6 mice to gamma-radiation at 0.84, 3.7, or 18 Gy/h, and found an inverse dose rate response in cataract formation in the lens of the eye. This supports previous epidemiological evidence as reviewed in Hamada et al ( 2016 ).…”
Section: Experimental Evidence Of a Dose Rate Effectsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This transcriptional response can considerably change on a quantitative and qualitative point of view, in function of cell type, dose and quality of radiation (Bufalieri et al, 2012;Giusti et al, 2014). Moreover, tissue response to irradiation is very complex and cannot be recapitulated by studies on isolated cell lines in active proliferation, involving completely different signaling pathways (Bufalieri et al, 2012;Fratini et al, 2011;Hamada et al, 2016;Licursi et al, 2017). Several studies suggested that the radiation response is not limited to the targeted cells but can propagate to surrounding cells and tissues, a phenomenon known as bystander effects (Brooks et al, 1974;Marín et al, 2015;Mothersill & Seymour, 2006) and even to untargeted organs (abscopal effects, (Mole, 1953;Yilmaz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%