1997
DOI: 10.1093/screen/38.4.372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special report. The changing geography of third cinema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While these political cinemas have already triggered geopolitical shifts, they continue to be seen in oppositional terms vis-à-vis imperialism, a theoretical position that unfairly replicates the normative preeminence of exploitative impulses. Michael Chanan's new geographies of Third Cinema fold the margins and the interstices of the global Empire back into its centre; there, he hopes, they can redefine the terms of a collective politics of resistance appropriate to the increasingly interlaced experiences of the social outcasts of the North and the South (Chanan 1997). The programmatic commitment of anti-imperialist cinemas in Latin America, Africa, and South-East Asia evolved but never ceased to question the normativity of Western and American globalism.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these political cinemas have already triggered geopolitical shifts, they continue to be seen in oppositional terms vis-à-vis imperialism, a theoretical position that unfairly replicates the normative preeminence of exploitative impulses. Michael Chanan's new geographies of Third Cinema fold the margins and the interstices of the global Empire back into its centre; there, he hopes, they can redefine the terms of a collective politics of resistance appropriate to the increasingly interlaced experiences of the social outcasts of the North and the South (Chanan 1997). The programmatic commitment of anti-imperialist cinemas in Latin America, Africa, and South-East Asia evolved but never ceased to question the normativity of Western and American globalism.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This narrow and essentializing definition was later expanded. Michael Chanan (1997: 378) points out that Solanas and Getino modified their earlier position on all three categories and agreed that ‘Second Cinema could be taken to include certain attempts at an alternative type of cinema which from a more comprehensive perspective are more correctly seen as alternate models of Third Cinema’ (Chanan, 1997: 377). This theoretical expansion enabled more possibilities to utilize different filming components and allowed for experimentation with and acceptance of a hybrid production which answers to no pressure or hegemony and ‘is no longer interested in quality or technique.…”
Section: Third Cinema In Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The film ignited a change of perception on the city of Paris as a transformational zone from the Bourgeoisie to the Left, as well as experimentation. On the other end of the spectrum, the third cinema movement 9 that started in the 1960s in Latin America emphasized the importance of militant cinema in making an intervention that implies a social response, hence the political participation of the viewer (Chanan, 1997). One of the most prominent films of the era was the 1968 picture La hora de Los Hornos (English: The Hour of the Furnaces) -an experimental film that was shot semiclandestinely in conjunction with members of organized resistance (Chanan, 1997).…”
Section: The Social Role Of Public Screenings and Revolutionary Filmmaking: A Brief Historical Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%