1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(99)00076-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation of iron in river and tap waters by catalytic spectrophotometry using oxidation of o-phenylenediamine with hydrogen peroxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fe(II) and Fe(III) were determined as Fe(III) by the methods, because of the oxidation of Fe(II) with H2O2. 3 In the FIA method, the sampling rate (8 samples h -1 ) for non-acidified samples was lower than that for acidified samples (1 mmol L -1 HCl), because of the longer tailing of the peak profile, as shown in Fig. 3 (B).…”
Section: Determination Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fe(II) and Fe(III) were determined as Fe(III) by the methods, because of the oxidation of Fe(II) with H2O2. 3 In the FIA method, the sampling rate (8 samples h -1 ) for non-acidified samples was lower than that for acidified samples (1 mmol L -1 HCl), because of the longer tailing of the peak profile, as shown in Fig. 3 (B).…”
Section: Determination Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 Therefore, when the dissolution of the adsorbed iron(III) hydroxide(s) is negligible, the adsorption does not cause any determination error for reactive iron in the proposed catalytic FIA. Figure 3 (B) shows the peak profiles measured by catalytic FIA.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Iron In the Fia Systemmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations