2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-016-1027-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species and lineage identification for yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye T. obesus tunas using two independent multiplex PCR assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, in the canned BET, even if NS occurred, only one sample was misidentified as SKJ. For BET samples, misidentification was rarer than in other species because NS did not occur in diagnostic positions [ 44 ]. This contrasts with LOT samples, in which a large number of NS at most of the diagnostic positions impacted species identification of defrosted and cooked individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in the canned BET, even if NS occurred, only one sample was misidentified as SKJ. For BET samples, misidentification was rarer than in other species because NS did not occur in diagnostic positions [ 44 ]. This contrasts with LOT samples, in which a large number of NS at most of the diagnostic positions impacted species identification of defrosted and cooked individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() yielded low COI genetic distance among three Thunnus species, T. albacares , T. atlanticus and T. tonggol and argued that COI was not useful in delimiting these closely related species. However, genetic markers had been applied to discriminate Thunnus species in several studies (Higashi et al., ; Kumar, Kocour, & Kunal, ; Pedrosa‐Gerasmio, Babaran, & Santos, ), and three pairs of species ( T. thynnus and T. alalunga , T. thynnus and T. orientalis , T. alalunga and T. albacares ) by D‐loop region and the first internal transcribed spacer region (Mitchell & Hellberg, ). In the present study, although low interspecific divergence was found among the three species, network analyses showed that T. obesus (eight sequences) shared a haplotype with T. albacares , while T. tonggol did not share haplotypes with the other two species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish length for both size categories was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a caliper. Species identification was performed using a molecular biological technique, namely, multiplex PCR (Higashi et al 2016), using small portions of each specimen. In previous studies, the length of large juveniles is usually expressed as FL, whereas SL is usually used for small juveniles.…”
Section: Field Sampling and Laboratory Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%