2022
DOI: 10.14214/sf.10732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species selection in areas subjected to risk of root and butt rot: applying Precision forestry in Norway

Abstract: Highlights• We present the best species to plant on previously spruce-dominated sites with different site indexes and rot levels. • We recommend planting Norway spruce on low-rot sites, Scots pine on higher-rot sites, and allowing natural regeneration on low site indexes. • We demonstrate the Precision forestry method for determining the optimal tree species in heterogenous stands. • In the case study, the method increased net present value by approximately 6% on average.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a machine to correctly plant seedlings, they need reliable information about the site, which digital data sources could provide (Skogforsk, 2022). Other variables not brought up in Paper I should also be further investigated, for example using harvester data for tree species selection (Saksa et al, 2021;Aza et al, 2022). Applying high resolution data to species distribution models could also provide possible support in tree species selection (Gastón et al, 2014).…”
Section: Digital Tools and Forest Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a machine to correctly plant seedlings, they need reliable information about the site, which digital data sources could provide (Skogforsk, 2022). Other variables not brought up in Paper I should also be further investigated, for example using harvester data for tree species selection (Saksa et al, 2021;Aza et al, 2022). Applying high resolution data to species distribution models could also provide possible support in tree species selection (Gastón et al, 2014).…”
Section: Digital Tools and Forest Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%