2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species specific connectivity in reserve-network design using graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have demonstrated that systematic conservation planning applications based on protecting areas where the species are currently present are not sufficient to ensure their persistence in fragmented landscapes (Carroll et al, 2003;van Teeffelen et al, 2006;Cerdeira et al, 2010). Indeed, species extinctions can be expected within protected areas if the surrounding unprotected areas of habitat are lost or heavily altered (Cabeza, 2003;DeFries et al, 2005), as it is difficult for populations to persist in regions where patches are small and scattered (Hanski, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that systematic conservation planning applications based on protecting areas where the species are currently present are not sufficient to ensure their persistence in fragmented landscapes (Carroll et al, 2003;van Teeffelen et al, 2006;Cerdeira et al, 2010). Indeed, species extinctions can be expected within protected areas if the surrounding unprotected areas of habitat are lost or heavily altered (Cabeza, 2003;DeFries et al, 2005), as it is difficult for populations to persist in regions where patches are small and scattered (Hanski, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Through its influence on animal movements, connectivity may largely determine predator-prey interactions (Kareiva 1987, Ryall and Fahrig 2006, Baggio et al 2011. Species-specific habitat connectivity (Bunn et al 2000, Cerdeira et al 2010, therefore, can influence trophic interactions, species assemblages, and biodiversity patterns (Dray et al 2012). When prey have a high dispersal ability and are frequently on the move, predators cannot perfectly match the prey distribution, and the two groups coexist, which they might not have done in a simpler landscape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the importance of any given protected area to waterfowl will be a function of a complex interaction of local land‐use practices, local policies, precipitation patterns and other large‐scale climate factors (Hansen & DeFries ; Cerdeira et al . ; Beatty et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%