2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species-specific traits associated to prediction errors in bird habitat suitability modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
81
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model always had a lower predictive power for Palearctic ducks, highly gregarious species, than for Ardeids, the least gregarious species in this study. This is in accordance with a negative impact of gregariousness on the predictive power of the model, an observation already made by Seoane et al (2005). One approach to improve this was to mask out areas were a bird group had never been observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The model always had a lower predictive power for Palearctic ducks, highly gregarious species, than for Ardeids, the least gregarious species in this study. This is in accordance with a negative impact of gregariousness on the predictive power of the model, an observation already made by Seoane et al (2005). One approach to improve this was to mask out areas were a bird group had never been observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Other studies have shown that the breadth of a species' niche relative to the environmental conditions found in the study area as a whole influences model accuracy more than the breadth of a species' niche per se (Seoane et al 2005;Hernandez et al 2006). More marginal species (those that have niches furthest from the average conditions of the study area) have also been shown to be modelled more accurately than less marginal species, probably for similar reasons (Luoto et al 2005;Seoane et al 2005;Carrascal et al 2006;Hernandez et al 2006). We might expect therefore that the accuracy of species distribution models will decrease with increasing niche breadth or habitat tolerance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, it has been argued that species that are difficult to detect are likely to have more incomplete occurrence data. This may result in lower accurate distribution models for these species (Seoane et al 2005). In this study, we test whether increasing the length of the point counts makes it possible, above all, to improve the models' explanatory and predictive performance for species with a low detection probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%