2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep27756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific impacts of beech and Norway spruce on the structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and soil microbial communities

Abstract: The impacts of plant species on the microbial communities and physico-chemical characteristics of soil are well documented for many herbs, grasses and legumes but much less so for tree species. Here, we investigate by rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing the diversity of microorganisms from the three domains of life (Archaea, Bacteria and Eukaryota:Fungi) in soil samples taken from the forest experimental site of Breuil-Chenue (France). We discovered significant differences in the abundance, composition and struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(131 reference statements)
12
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings agree with the previously reported ectomycorrhizal status of oaks (Herrmann and Buscot, 2007) and the tree ability to interact with large microbial communities which assist in nutrients acquisition (Jumpponen and Jones, 2009;Tarkka et al, 2013). The tree rootassociated microorganisms are well-known to serve in improving tree health and nutrition, preventing establishment of pathogens, and adapting to specific local environmental conditions (Uroz et al, 2016;Gehring et al, 2017;Lau et al, 2017).…”
Section: Differences In Microbial Community Composition Between Soilssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings agree with the previously reported ectomycorrhizal status of oaks (Herrmann and Buscot, 2007) and the tree ability to interact with large microbial communities which assist in nutrients acquisition (Jumpponen and Jones, 2009;Tarkka et al, 2013). The tree rootassociated microorganisms are well-known to serve in improving tree health and nutrition, preventing establishment of pathogens, and adapting to specific local environmental conditions (Uroz et al, 2016;Gehring et al, 2017;Lau et al, 2017).…”
Section: Differences In Microbial Community Composition Between Soilssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Most studies on soil bacteria and archaea responses to plant identity have examined taxonomically diverse plant species (Angel, Soares, Ungar, & Gillor, ; Nacke et al., ; Scheibe et al., ; Schlatter, Bakker, Bradeen, & Kinkel, ; Uroz et al., ). Many find that tree species identity explains a small proportion of the variation in soil bacterial community composition (Schlatter et al., ; Urbanova et al., ; Uroz et al., ), or that one particular plant species explains the difference in community composition (Schlatter et al., ). Our findings fit within these studies, but we found that species identity at a narrow phylogenetic scale, primarily within the Salix genus, can differentiate soil microbial communities even if the overall effects are small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences were considered statistically significant at a 0.05 probability level in this study. Mothur software [42] was employed to analyze the alpha diversity index and rarefaction, and the coverage index was used to represent the sequencing depth index. The Ace (https://www.mothur.org/wiki/Ace) and Chao1 (https://www.mothur.org/wiki/Chao) indexes were used to represent the community abundance, while the Shannon (https://www.mothur.org/wiki/Shannon) and Simpson (https://www.mothur.org/wiki/Simpson) indexes were used to represent the species richness and diversity of the fungal community [43,44].…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%