1982
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-59-1-149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity and Properties of the Genome-linked Proteins of Nepoviruses

Abstract: SUMMARYThe infectivity of the RNA of six nepoviruses was decreased or abolished by proteinase K treatment, whereas that of the RNA of cowpea mosaic virus (comovirus group) or tomato bushy stunt virus was unaffected. The extent of the decrease in infectivity was characteristic for each nepovirus and was independent of the plant species used as virus source or as assay host. The infectivity of raspberry ringspot virus (RRV) RNA was less affected than that of the other nepoviruses but treatment with Pronase decre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps RNA-2 was replicated but either the synthesis and breakdown balanced at a level equivalent to that originally taken up by the protoplasts, or the RNA which was synthesized, and which functioned as a messenger, was not infective. The infectivity of TBRV RNA is almost completely abolished by treatment with protease (Harrison & Barker, 1978), probably because the genome-linked protein is destroyed (Mayo et al, 1982). Perhaps the RNA-2 synthesized in protoplasts inoculated with RNA-I(A) + RNA-2(G) was not infective because it lacked a genome-linked protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps RNA-2 was replicated but either the synthesis and breakdown balanced at a level equivalent to that originally taken up by the protoplasts, or the RNA which was synthesized, and which functioned as a messenger, was not infective. The infectivity of TBRV RNA is almost completely abolished by treatment with protease (Harrison & Barker, 1978), probably because the genome-linked protein is destroyed (Mayo et al, 1982). Perhaps the RNA-2 synthesized in protoplasts inoculated with RNA-I(A) + RNA-2(G) was not infective because it lacked a genome-linked protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two isolates of TBRV were used: strain A, of the Scottish (= beet ringspot) serotype, and strain G of the German (= potato bouquet) serotype. Virus was propagated in Nieotiana clevelandii plants and purified from infected leaves by trituration in phosphate buffer, clarification with 8-5~ (v/v) butan-1-ol, precipitation with 10~ polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 + 0.17 M-NaC1, and differential centrifugation as described by Mayo et al (1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White Burley. Leaves were harvested 7 days after inocukltion and virus was purified as described by Mayo et al (1982). Virus which was to be used for the production of antiserum was further purified by centrifugation (3.5 h at 45000 g, 4 °C) in a density gradient of 5 to 20~ sucrose m 0./t7 M-sodium phosphate pH 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome of SLRV consists of two RNA species of 9.0 and 5-15 kb (Everett et al, 1994) that are translated as polyproteins (Hellen et al, 1991). The RNAs are polyadenylated at their 3' termini (Mayo et al, 1979), and contain a protein covalently bound to their 5' termini (Mayo et al, 1982). Some isolates of SLRV have The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper will appear in the EMBL, GenBank and DDBJ nucleotide sequence databases under the accession number X75165.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some isolates of SLRV have The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper will appear in the EMBL, GenBank and DDBJ nucleotide sequence databases under the accession number X75165. a 1"2 kb satellite RNA species (Mayo et al, 1974(Mayo et al, , 1982Gallitelli et al, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%