1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity of the induction of the enzymes of the lac operon in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
1
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phytase production increased dramatically after 4 h of induction. Delay in enzyme production on lactose induction during fed-batch cultivation of E. coli BL21(DE3) cells has been reported earlier [32,42] and could be explained by the time needed for lactose to be processed to allolactose, an inducer for lac UV5 in E. coli chromosome and lac o in pET-22b(+) [11,25].…”
Section: Production Of the Recombinant Phytase By Fed-batch Cultivatimentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Phytase production increased dramatically after 4 h of induction. Delay in enzyme production on lactose induction during fed-batch cultivation of E. coli BL21(DE3) cells has been reported earlier [32,42] and could be explained by the time needed for lactose to be processed to allolactose, an inducer for lac UV5 in E. coli chromosome and lac o in pET-22b(+) [11,25].…”
Section: Production Of the Recombinant Phytase By Fed-batch Cultivatimentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Alcohol dehydrogenase [2] Bacteria dehydrogenase 131 L-Amino oxidase [4] Xanthine oxidase [S, 61 nunsferases Phosphorylase 171 Levan saccharase [8] Hydroluses Acetylcholinesterase [9] Lipase [lo, 111 Trypsin [I 11…”
Section: Onidoreductasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Some of these compounds were able to mimic the natural inducer allolactose, while others bound but failed to induce, indicating that binding to the repressor was not sufficient to cause the allosteric response. [8][9][10][11] MullerHill extended the list of effector molecules and classified them as inducers or anti-inducers based upon how they modulated bacterial growth, 8 and Riggs performed extensive in vitro binding assays in an attempt to understand how a group of chemically similar compounds could produce such distinct phenotypes. 11 A classification scheme arose whereby effectors were defined as inducers when the binding lowered the repressor's affinity for the operator and as anti-inducers when their binding stabilized the repressor-operator complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%