2015
DOI: 10.1080/0144929x.2015.1004650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying the dynamics of social technologies as social microworlds

Abstract: This paper explores the affordances of social technologies for supporting the construction of a shareable artefact by a group of learners. A qualitative study that captures the use of five different types of social technologies (Facebook, blogs, wikis, Google Documents and Dropbox) in three different classroom settings sheds light on the potentials and challenges of these tools for supporting material exploration, artefact construction and evaluation. Qualitative content analysis of instructors' field notes, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good collaborative features of wikis include easy communication and sharing of information with other users, and ease in updating of editing documents collaboratively. Parmaxi and Zaphiris (2015) established that asynchronous communication supported by wikis help a group in creating a single artefact together. According to a study on wiki use in new product development, efficient collaboration among users via wikis led to higher frequency of usage (Reid et al 2016).…”
Section: Collaboration Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good collaborative features of wikis include easy communication and sharing of information with other users, and ease in updating of editing documents collaboratively. Parmaxi and Zaphiris (2015) established that asynchronous communication supported by wikis help a group in creating a single artefact together. According to a study on wiki use in new product development, efficient collaboration among users via wikis led to higher frequency of usage (Reid et al 2016).…”
Section: Collaboration Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%