1995
DOI: 10.1109/36.469492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral and spatial decorrelation of Landsat-TM data for lossless compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, all the infrared bands are a little correlated, both with the visible bands and with one another. Band 4 is especially so weakly correlated with any other band, that only spatial prediction is usually employed for its decorrelation [7].…”
Section: A Landsat Tm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, all the infrared bands are a little correlated, both with the visible bands and with one another. Band 4 is especially so weakly correlated with any other band, that only spatial prediction is usually employed for its decorrelation [7].…”
Section: A Landsat Tm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve an optimum multispectral decorrelation, the different bands available were arranged to form a sequence that maximizes the average cross-correlation between any couple of consecutive bands [7]. The optimum sequence, which depends mostly on the sensor and to a lesser extent on the cover, was found to be [10], [17] for all the three test TM images.…”
Section: A Landsat Tm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, compression methods for multispectral images must be developed. There exist both lossless [3][4][5] and lossy schemes [6][7][8]. The compression ratios in lossless compression are from 2 to 5, but in lossy compression they can be ten-fold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lossless methods applied vector quantisation [3], prediction and band ordering [4], and spectral and spatial decorrelation with residual image coding [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%