2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6853764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral anomaly detection using graph-based filtering for wireless sensor networks

Abstract: This paper introduces a novel spectral anomaly detection method by developing a graph-based filtering framework. In particular, we consider the problem of unsupervised data anomaly detection over wireless sensor networks (WSNs) where sensor measurements are represented as signals on a graph. In our framework, graphs are chosen to capture useful proximity information about measured data. The associated graph-based filters are then employed to project the graph signals on normal and anomaly subspaces, and result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, data observations that are similar at neighboring nodes lead naturally to a smooth (low-pass) graph signal. Such a smooth graph signal model makes it possible to detect outliers or abnormal values by highpass filtering and thresholding [51], [155], or to build effective signal reconstruction methods from sparse set of sensor readings, as in [156], [157], [158], which can potentially lead to significant savings in energy resources, bandwidth and latency in sensor network applications.…”
Section: A Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, data observations that are similar at neighboring nodes lead naturally to a smooth (low-pass) graph signal. Such a smooth graph signal model makes it possible to detect outliers or abnormal values by highpass filtering and thresholding [51], [155], or to build effective signal reconstruction methods from sparse set of sensor readings, as in [156], [157], [158], which can potentially lead to significant savings in energy resources, bandwidth and latency in sensor network applications.…”
Section: A Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we refer to some survey papers that cover many of the recent techniques in graph based approaches: [32] and [33]. In particular, similar to the low rank approaches for SD networks, there are low rank approaches to graph models such as [34] who assume the inverse covariance matrix of their wireless sensor network data has a graph structure and solve a low rank penalized Gaussian graphical model problem and [35] who impose graph smoothness by a low rank assumption on graph Laplacian of the features of the network. [36] also uses a low rank approach on their KDD intrusion data set, but they directly apply the low rank assumption to the network characteristics of their data.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we evaluate Algorithm 1 with image data. We use the Brodatz texture images from the USC-SIPI dataset 3 . We take the subset of rotated textures straw*.tiff and partition each image into non-overlapping blocks of size 8 × 8.…”
Section: B Image Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, in signal processing and machine learning, graphs have been extensively used for modeling high dimensional datasets, where graphs' nodes represent objects of interest and the edges with designated weights encode pairwise relations between them. Applications of such models include transformation [1], filtering [2], [3] and sampling of signals defined on graphs [4], as well as clustering [5], [6], semi-supervised learning [7], dynamical systems [8], [9], and network-oriented data problems [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%