2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47426-3_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Clustering by Subspace Randomization and Graph Fusion for High-Dimensional Data

Abstract: Subspace clustering has been gaining increasing attention in recent years due to its promising ability in dealing with high-dimensional data. However, most of the existing subspace clustering methods tend to only exploit the subspace information to construct a single affinity graph (typically for spectral clustering), which often lack the ability to go beyond a single graph to explore multiple graphs built in various subspaces in high-dimensional space. To address this, this paper presents a new spectral clust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three conventional clustering methods are selected for comparison, including spectral clustering with normalized cut (Ncut), Kmeans and sparse subspace clustering (SSC) [30]. Two newer clustering algorithms from recent years are also added for comparison, USENC [31] and SC-SRGF [32]. As shown in the table, HFSC achieves the best performances among all datasets.…”
Section: Comprehensive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three conventional clustering methods are selected for comparison, including spectral clustering with normalized cut (Ncut), Kmeans and sparse subspace clustering (SSC) [30]. Two newer clustering algorithms from recent years are also added for comparison, USENC [31] and SC-SRGF [32]. As shown in the table, HFSC achieves the best performances among all datasets.…”
Section: Comprehensive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collect all the spectral coordinates computed and add them as additional features to the boundary representation b i = (x i , y i , z i , r i ). We then use the high-dimensional data spectral clustering of [61] to cluster all object models within a category together. The algorithm of [61] provides a spectral clustering approach based on subspace randomization and graph fusion for high-dimensional data, which enables us to carry out both segmentation and co-segmentation tasks for a single shape or family of shape models (co-segmentation).…”
Section: Part Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then use the high-dimensional data spectral clustering of [61] to cluster all object models within a category together. The algorithm of [61] provides a spectral clustering approach based on subspace randomization and graph fusion for high-dimensional data, which enables us to carry out both segmentation and co-segmentation tasks for a single shape or family of shape models (co-segmentation). To examine whether these added features to the original shape help with the segmentation task, we tested our off-the-shelf method on the Princeton Segmentation Benchmark [62].…”
Section: Part Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet a common limitation to most graph-based clustering methods is that they often rely on some predefined affinity graph, which lack the ability to learn the affinity graph adaptively. To deal with this limitation, some graph learning methods have been developed, aiming to learn a better graph via optimization or some heuristics [3]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%