Missing data are prevalent issue in analyses involving data collection. The problem of missing data is exacerbated for multisource analysis, where data from multiple sensors are combined to arrive at a single conclusion. In this scenario, it is more likely to occur and can lead to discarding a large amount of data collected; however, the information from observed sensors can be leveraged to estimate those values not observed. We propose two methods for imputation of multisource data, both of which take advantage of potential correlation between data from different sensors, through ridge regression and a state-space model. These methods, as well as the common median imputation, are applied to data collected from a variety of sensors monitoring an experimental facility. Performance of imputation methods is compared with the mean absolute deviation; however, rather than using this metric to solely rank the methods, we also propose an approach to identify significant differences. Imputation techniques will also be assessed by their ability to produce appropriate confidence intervals, through coverage and length, around the imputed values. Finally, performance of imputed datasets is compared with a marginalized dataset through a weighted k-means clustering. In general, we found that imputation through a dynamic linear model tended to be the most accurate and to produce the most precise confidence intervals, and that imputing the missing values and down weighting them with respect to observed values in the analysis led to the most accurate performance. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Ind. 2018, 34 44-60 E. CASLETON ET AL.improved estimation and accuracy and more precise inferences [5], assuming the data has been optimally combined [6]. Multisource data analysis is similar or analogous to techniques such as multimodality [7], multi-intelligence, data fusion [5], and sensor fusion [8]. These forms of analysis are common in diverse research areas, such as problems of interest to the Department of Defense [5], robotics [9], and biomedical research [7].For two main reasons, the problem of missing data is exacerbated in the multisource regime. First, because the analysis will include data from multiple sensors, there is a higher probability that at least one will fail at some point during the study, leading to missing data. Secondly, if data are missing from a single sensor at, say, time t, and the default method of marginalization is implemented, observed data from all other sensors at time t will not contribute to an analysis. Further, if data are missing from different sensors at different times, the total analyzed sample size could be drastically reduced from that collected. Often, the types of data explored in multisource analysis are expensive to collect and store, thus, marginalization is not a good option for missing multisource data in terms of resource utilization.Alternatively, the multisource setting provides an opportunit...