Coastal Engineering 1988 1989
DOI: 10.1061/9780872626874.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Wave Attenuation by Bottom Friction: Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The practical limitation of the present results is that they require a priori knowledge of the bottom roughness, kb. Experimental results directed towards overcoming this limitation are presented in a companion paper by Madsen and Rosengaus (1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical limitation of the present results is that they require a priori knowledge of the bottom roughness, kb. Experimental results directed towards overcoming this limitation are presented in a companion paper by Madsen and Rosengaus (1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were placed along the bottom of the flume at 10 cm intervals, crest to crest, measured perpendicular to their axes. The height and spacing of the ripples were chosen to represent the bed form characteristics observed by Madsen and Rosengaus [1989] in wave experiments over a movable bed. In the present experiments, four configurations were used depending on the angle of incidence 0 (0 ø, 30 ø, 45 ø and 60 ø) between the ripple axis and the y direction as shown in Figure 2a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Nelson [66], the breaking parameter for wave breaking caused by changes in depth can be determined by considering the bottom slope and depth, and a value of 0.46 improves the wave setup estimations instead of the default value of 0.54. The bottom friction applied was the Madsen et al [67] formulation with an equivalent roughness length scale of 0.05 providing a more reasonable wave height than the default bottom friction JONSWAP [68]. The bottom drag formulation was computed using Manning's value of n = 0.22 for reefs [25], and wind drag was computed using the Garratt formulation [69].…”
Section: Adcirc and Swan Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%