2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrally resolved actinic flux and photolysis frequencies of key species within an indoor environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
81
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations based on Fresnel's equations, comparisons between simulations and laboratory measurements, including those made in the framework of the European project ADOPT, and measurements within a real room show that the transmittance decreases when the incidence angle increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Calculations based on Fresnel's equations, comparisons between simulations and laboratory measurements, including those made in the framework of the European project ADOPT, and measurements within a real room show that the transmittance decreases when the incidence angle increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An empirical relationship to directly calculate indoor actinic fluxes for a given room from the TUV spectrum as a function of the solar zenithal angle using an architectural model has been proposed . However, as shown above, the type of window will strongly affect the transmittance and therefore needs to be taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such values must then be attenuated to be representative for indoors. Although there is limited information in the literature, recent measurements have shown that while light at the visible wavelengths needed to photolyze NO 2 and HONO is typically attenuated to 10%‐15% of that outdoors, for species photolyzed in the UV (such as ozone to give excited oxygen state atoms), transmission is typically <1% of that outdoors. Nazaroff and Cass found that 0.7% and 0.15% of visible and UV light, respectively, were transmitted through museum skylights and 0.15% in the UV, while for two laboratories in Greece with large windows, 70%‐80% of the visible light was transmitted indoors compared to 25%‐30% in the UV .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%