2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopic study of prompt-gamma emission for range verification in proton therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shape analysis of the profiles suggests that the contribution from the 16 O(p, Xγ 4.44 MeV ) 12 C is overestimated in TALYS, the model also does not account for anisotropy in angular distribution of gamma emission. Similar comparison using available literature data for relevant cross sections as input shows better agreement (for details, see [5] and references therein). However, literature data are not available in full range covered by the experiment.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shape analysis of the profiles suggests that the contribution from the 16 O(p, Xγ 4.44 MeV ) 12 C is overestimated in TALYS, the model also does not account for anisotropy in angular distribution of gamma emission. Similar comparison using available literature data for relevant cross sections as input shows better agreement (for details, see [5] and references therein). However, literature data are not available in full range covered by the experiment.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The prompt-gamma depth profiles were determined for three phantom materials and two detection angles. The experiment was described in detail in [5]. The second experiment was performed recently at the Cyclotron Centre Bronowice (CCB) in Kraków and focused on studying the effects related to the change of beam energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we present a clinical scenario where protons, helium and carbon ions irradiate not only samples of water plus sugar solutions with high oxygen concentration, but also tissue surrogate inserts with lower oxygen concentration and variable calcium concentrations. Conversely to previous works 32, [44][45][46] , we used CeBr 3 detectors www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ instead of HPGe detectors. These detectors are at the moment more prepared for clinical conditions than HPGe detectors, both for the online range verification 42,43,47 and the determination of the target elemental compositions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various emission lines listed above, we targeted 4.4 MeV gamma rays for future on-line monitoring in proton therapy. Note that the 1-D profile of 4.4 MeV gamma rays along the proton beam is reported by several other groups mainly by using a slit collimator 11,14,16 , but no experimental results on 2-D images have been reported so far, particularly using a Compton camera. For precision measurement of a 4.4 MeV gamma ray image and its detailed comparison with the energy deposited by protons, we developed 3-D PSCC that features the 1−10 MeV range.…”
Section: Precision Imaging Of 44 Mev Gamma Raysmentioning
confidence: 96%