2018
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2017.2735659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum Allocation for Noncooperative Radar Coexistence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notched waveform design formulation in Section 2 relies on the availability of knowledge regarding where spectral notches are required. For spectrum sensing and estimation approaches such as FSS described in Section 3 and [31], the act of estimating interference in real data introduces the possibility of estimation error even for stationary RFI. While the SINR degradation related either to underestimating interference (missed detection) or overestimating interference (false alarm) is relatively obvious, there also exists the prospect of correctly estimating RFI, but with varying bandwidth from pulse to pulse.…”
Section: Impact Of Notch Width Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The notched waveform design formulation in Section 2 relies on the availability of knowledge regarding where spectral notches are required. For spectrum sensing and estimation approaches such as FSS described in Section 3 and [31], the act of estimating interference in real data introduces the possibility of estimation error even for stationary RFI. While the SINR degradation related either to underestimating interference (missed detection) or overestimating interference (false alarm) is relatively obvious, there also exists the prospect of correctly estimating RFI, but with varying bandwidth from pulse to pulse.…”
Section: Impact Of Notch Width Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the FM noise waveform spectral notching capability is incorporated into a cognitive radar framework that performs spectrum sensing on a per‐pulse basis, estimates the spectral footprint of any in‐band interference, and then adjusts the notch location(s) and width(s) in an automated manner. The fast spectrum sensing (FSS) algorithm [30, 31], which mimics the rapid data assimilation capability of the human thalamus [32], is used to quickly estimate the frequency intervals requiring notching. For interference taking the form of frequency‐hopping orthogonal frequency division multiplexed (OFDM) communications, this overall cognitive strategy employs FSS to inform the subsequent notching of FM noise waveforms, with the ultimate goal of achieving real‐time RFI avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach was recently investigated to refine the spectral content into a subset of representative information, thereby reducing the number of frequency bins ( ) input to SS-MO [ 14 ]. This fast SS-MO technique simultaneously reduces the computational complexity while preserving the performance of multi-objective optimization.…”
Section: Data Collection Generation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure efficient and interference-free operation of cognitive radar to optimize target detection performance, the radar illuminator must dynamically sense and avoid spectral regions wherein RFI is present [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Based upon the detection of such interference bands or sub-bands, appropriate waveform design strategies can then be employed to enhance cognitive radar performance [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, radar systems must employ real-time dynamic spectrum access for spectrum sharing due to an increasingly congested RF spectrum. The need for a cognitive radar system to adapt its transmit waveform in real time to avoid RF interference (RFI) has been underscored [2,3]. Cognitive radar systems employing RFI avoidance via centre frequency (CF) and bandwidth adaptation have been shown to significantly improve the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio while operating in-band with other RF sources by mitigating mutual interference [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%