1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1995.479769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrum estimation by neural networks and their use for target classification by radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8][9][10]. However, these methods are mainly concentrated on estimating the interval of adjacent spectrum lines, and they often require a higher pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and longer observation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10]. However, these methods are mainly concentrated on estimating the interval of adjacent spectrum lines, and they often require a higher pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and longer observation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above properties are invariant to the radar line of sight angle, i.e, they agree with any radar azimuth as long as there is no shielding of the rotating structures. Most current methods of extracting JEM features are first compensating for the fuselage component signal, and then estimating the modulated wave's periodicity and the modulated Doppler line spectra's interval by parametric methods, such as complex cepstrum method [10], auto correlation method [11], periodogram method [12], AR model power spectrum method [13]. Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On basis of analyzing the performance of methods using some typical low-resolution radar target classification features [15,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], [16] indicates that the classification method based on dispersion situations of eigenvalue spectra (CMDSES) outgoes other methods remarkably.…”
Section: Fuzzy-fractal-feature-based Classification Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%