Speech and language skills in children who required neonatal intensive care. I. Spontaneous speech at 6.5 years of age

Jennische, Margareta; Sedin, Gunnar

doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb01526.x

Cited by 32 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Excluded studies that presented data relating to the wider group of infants born between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation have been detailed for reference (see Table 2). [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] For example, Darlow et al 27 considered 2-year outcomes in an entire preterm cohort, including a subgroup of infants who were born at 33 to 36 weeks' gestation; although excluded on the basis of gestational age, this study provided useful comparative data for the wider group.…”

Section: Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Childhood Development of Late-Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

McGowan¹,

Alderdice²,

Holmes³

et al. 2011

Pediatrics

207

156

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CONTEXT: Late-preterm infants (LPIs) born at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation are increasingly regarded as being at risk for adverse developmental outcomes. To date, the early childhood development of LPIs has not been systematically considered. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a broad examination of literature relating to early childhood development at the ages of 1 to 7 years of LPIs born at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of early childhood outcomes in LPIs by using 9 electronic databases (January 1980 to March 2010). Bibliographies were reviewed. After examination of abstracts, ineligible studies were excluded. A specifically designed data-extraction form was used. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed by using well-documented quality-appraisal guidelines. RESULTS: Of 4581 studies, 10 (3 prospective and 7 retrospective cohort) were included. Studies were heterogeneous, and poorer outcomes were reported among LPIs in relation to neurodevelopmental disabilities, educational ability, early-intervention requirements, medical disabilities, and physical growth in comparison to term-born children. No identified study used healthy nonadmitted LPIs as a comparison group for admitted LPIs. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that LPIs are at increased risk of adverse developmental outcomes and academic difficulties up to 7 years of age in comparison to term infants. An infant control group matched for gestational age has not been used; thus, for LPIs, the effect of neonatal admission on longer-term outcomes has not been fully explored. Systematic measurement of early childhood outcomes is lacking, and focused long-term follow-up studies are needed to investigate early childhood development after late-preterm birth.

show abstract

Section: Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Childhood Development of Late-Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

McGowan¹,

Alderdice²,

Holmes³

et al. 2011

Pediatrics

207

156

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Jennische and Sedin found that children who received intensive neonatal care had subsequent problems with both spontaneous speech and measures in language tests 25, 26. Small for gestational age in particular was an indicator of subsequent problems.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Comorbidity in severe developmental language disorders: Neuropediatric and psychological considerations

Selassie

Jennische²,

Kyllerman

et al. 2005

Acta Paediatrica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To explore possible patterns of comorbidity in children with severe developmental language disorders (DLD). Methods: A retrospective investigation of the clinical records of 28 children relating to oral motor and language problems, psychological profiles, medical history and EEG findings. Results: 36% of all the children had pure expressive language problems, 64% had combined expressive‐receptive language problems and 57% had additional oral motor problems. Girls predominated in expressive‐receptive problems, while boys predominated in oral motor problems. Children with expressive‐receptive disorders were over‐represented at the lower end of normal full‐scale IQ (p=0.015). Lower verbal than non‐verbal IQ levels were almost as common as equal levels, but a lower non‐verbal IQ than verbal IQ was also found. Pre/perinatal problems were found in 21%, and heredity for developmental language problems or dyslexia in 39%. There was a higher proportion of attention and motor problems, EEG abnormalities, and epileptic syndromes than in the general population (p<0.001). Conclusion: In severe DLD, both pure expressive and mixed expressive‐receptive problems are found, and oral motor problems are common. Gender differences regarding symptoms are present. Receptive language ability is associated with the full‐scale IQ level. A high proportion of EEG abnormalities and epilepsy is found. There is a complex pattern of comorbidity between speech‐language symptoms, psychological characteristics, heredity and EEG findings.

show abstract

“…Often, infants either born prematurely or possessing congenital diseases need temporary nutritional support via tube feeding. Frequently, these infants display feeding impairments and motor speech delays (Bier et al, 1993; Jennische and Sedin, 1998,1999; Hawdon et al, 2000; Dodrill et al, 2004). It is possible in these cases that impaired oral feeding is due to hypersensitivity in the oropharyngeal region.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orosensory deprivation alters taste-elicited c-Fos expression in the parabrachial nucleus of neonatal rats

Haino

Hironaka

Ooka

et al. 2010

Neuroscience Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the present study we examined the effects of neonatal orosensory deprivation on taste-elicited gustatory activity in the rat parabrachial nucleus (PBN) using the functional anatomical marker cFos. Animals in three groups (GG, GO and GM) received gastric cannula implantation surgery on postnatal day 9 (P9). Animals in the fourth group (MR) did not receive any surgery. GG rats were fed by infusion of artificial milk directly into the stomach. GO rats were fed by intraoral infusion of artificial milk. GM and MR rats were reared by their mother with free access to mother's milk, water and rat chow. Rats from all groups were similar in body weight and length by P21. On P21 rats in all groups were intraorally presented with 0.5 M sucrose solution and the brains were extracted and processed for c-Fos immunohistchemistry. Taste-elicited c-Fos expression in both the gustatory waist area, and the external lateral subnucleus of the PBN in rats in the GG group was significantly more robust than in the other three groups. These findings suggest a substantial alteration in orosensoryevoked neuronal response in this nucleus, due to sensory or motor deprivation during a critical developmental stage.

show abstract

Speech and language skills in children who required neonatal intensive care. I. Spontaneous speech at 6.5 years of age

Cited by 32 publications

References 28 publications

Early Childhood Development of Late-Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Early Childhood Development of Late-Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Comorbidity in severe developmental language disorders: Neuropediatric and psychological considerations

Orosensory deprivation alters taste-elicited c-Fos expression in the parabrachial nucleus of neonatal rats

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About